Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ALL-POLITICS    |    Politics Unlimited    |    26,388 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 24,135 of 26,388    |
|    Chuck Pierson to Lee Lofaso    |
|    Notorious RBG - RIP    |
|    20 Sep 20 06:06:22    |
      MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5f66c72c       REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5f662ec0       PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20200711       CHRS: UTF-8 4       TZUTC: 0300       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2020-04-15       Hello, Lee Lofaso - Charles Pierson.       On 9/19/20 11:16 AM you wrote:               >> Cancer sucks. I don't care where you are on the political spectrum.        > Four cancers. All at the same time. Pancreatic cancer was the one        > that finally did her in. Surprised she lasted as long as she did.              Cancer survival or not is an odd creature for sure.                      >> Generally, this close to an election, the trend was to wait until        >> after to fill the seat.        > Not for Moscow Mitch. Trump will nominate a new justice. Moscow        > Mitch will grant him/her a hearing, and a vote. The only question        > being will this be before, or after, the election. Remember what        > Moscow Mitch did in 2016. He invoked "The Biden Rule" - a rule of        > his own creation. Said he would not allow the president to seat a        > new justice on the USSC during an election year. Why? Because "the        > American people" had to have a say. Remember, it was an election        > year.              Actually, there's a thing called the Thurmond rule, which has been used       inconsistently.              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurmond_rule               > Well, guess what? This is 2020. Another election year. Do you think        > Moscow Mitch is going to invoke his own made-up rule in order to        > deny his own president the right to nominate a justice to the USSC?              There was an article I read the other day that talked about this. I       wish I could find it now. It showed a while lot of inconsistency from       both parties on how this sort of situation has been handled in the past.                     --       Best regards!       Posted using Hotdoged on Android       ---         * Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 80/1 88/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131       SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/101       SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 700 1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 261/38       SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/464 1038 288/100 292/854 8125 301/1 113       SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 712/848       SEEN-BY: 770/1 801/188 197 202 900/100 106 108 902/6 7 25 26 27 920/1       SEEN-BY: 2452/250 4500/1 5058/104       PATH: 221/6 1 280/464 292/854 301/1 80/1 902/27 90/1 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca