TID: PX/Win v3.0pr5 PX96-0466M2   
   MSGID: 1:123/140 6440b5c5   
   TZUTC: -0400   
   On 08-08-20, DALE SHIPP said to GREGORY DEYSS:   
      
   -=> On 08-07-20  13:24,  Gregory Deyss <=-   
   -=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Floyd <=-   
      
      
   DS> It depends.  If it were always a deadly weapon, then why bother using it   
   DS> instead of a gun?  It is only a deadly weapon in some situations -- and   
   DS> this was not one of them.   
      
      
   The state in which this happened had previously ruled a taser a *deadly   
   weapon*!   
      
      
   GD> Because Dale.  Brooks ... did ... have ... a ... gun ...   
      
      
   DS>Really?  That is not in any of the reporting.  Enlighten us all as to   
   DS>your evidence that he had a gun during the incident that led to his   
   DS>being shot in the back.   
      
      
   Shipp likes to whip words and twist facts in an attempt to play the lefties'   
   favorite game; a never-ending flow of BS till the person he's aiming his crap   
   at gets tired of having to counter all his mis-information and stops talking   
   on whatever subject he's infusing false info into.   
      
      
   GD> There is no area of confusion or no ability to twist either, when it   
   GD> fits your narrative.  You can't have it both way when it suits you.   
   GD> The District Attorney ruled that the use of a taser "IS" a deadly   
   GD> weapon.   
      
      
   DS>Quote the ruling.  When is a taser a deadly weapon?   
      
      
   See; "The state in which this happened had previously ruled a taser a *deadly   
   weapon*.   
      
      
   DS>I do not believe   
   DS>that it can be considered as such when discharged randomly in the air   
   DS>from a considerable distance.  Site the ruling that shows I am wrong.   
      
      
   DS> I did not see or hear that in the video -- show me the time spot where   
   DS> it occurred.   
      
   GD> Again the video can be found at   
      
   GD> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5QEnGkIbzA   
      
   GD> 1:34 and then from there it shows in detail what those charges were.   
      
   DS>OK since it was not on the video in question, you dug up some other   
   DS>video by a youtube blogger.  I'm sure that if one searches enough they   
   DS>can come up with some source to say anything they want to say.  In any   
   DS>case, looking at time 3:12 the blogger goes on to claim that the DA has   
   DS>declared that a taser is a deadly weapon.  He presents a chart from the   
   DS>GA code that he claims supports his statement.  However, it explicitly   
   DS>outlines conditions under which an object might result in a charge of   
   DS>aggravated assault.  That article doe not mention a taser, and for the   
   DS>case in question the taser as discharged by Brooks does not fit the   
   DS>definition in the statue.  It was not discharged in a manner that did or   
   DS>could result in serious bodily harm.   
      
      
   DS>Try again if you can come up with a credible source.   
      
      
   An argument with a leftie democrat is an endless (and useless) endeavor.   
      
      
   It doesn't matter what the actual facts are, a leftie will twist the real   
   facts and also make up their own.   
      
      
   Why bother?   
      
      
   Tagline;   
      
      
   "LOOTING: When free housing, free food, free education, and free phones are   
   just not enough!"   
      
      
      
   ---   
   *Durango b301 #PE*    
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 15/0 19/36 80/1 88/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201   
   SEEN-BY: 116/18 120/331 340 123/131 140 153/7715 154/10 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426 700 1016 1017   
   SEEN-BY: 230/150 152 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 250/1 261/38 100 1466   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 267/155 275/100 280/464 5003 282/464 1031 1038 1056   
   SEEN-BY: 288/100 291/100 111 292/854 8125 301/1 113 310/31 317/3 320/119   
   SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 340/400 341/66 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 640/1321 1384 712/620 848 770/1 801/161 188 189 197 202 900/100   
   SEEN-BY: 900/106 108 902/6 7 25 26 27 920/1 2320/105 2452/250 3634/12   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 5058/104   
   PATH: 123/140 261/38 712/848 280/464 292/854 301/1 80/1 902/27   
   PATH: 90/1 229/426