Just a sample of the Echomail archive
11213306:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1,198 of 2,468  |
|  Alan B. Mac Farlane to All  |
|  Unlawfull Arrest of Patients  |
|  20 May 05 13:43:51  |
 From: alanb@sonic.net Unlawful Arrest of Patients Qualified Persons under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 are patients with a recommendation from their physician as well as these patients’ primary caregivers. There are no other qualifications. Qualified Persons are clearly exempt from marijuana prohibition laws, as upheld by our California Supreme Court in the Mower decision in 2002. Mower is currently the controlling precedent by law. Our Supreme Court held: As a result of the enactment of section 11362.5(d), the possession and cultivation of marijuana is no more criminal-so long as its conditions are satisfied-than the possession and acquisition of any prescription drug with a physician's prescription. [ People v. Mower, 28 Cal 4th 457, 482]. … in view of his or her status as a qualified patient or primary caregiver, the grand jury or the magistrate should not indict or commit the defendant in the first place, but instead should bring the prosecution to an end at that point. [Mower, ibid. 473] Evidence of a defendant’s status as a qualified patient or primary caregiver exculpates him or her from guilt of the crimes of possession or cultivation of marijuana, because such a status renders possession and cultivation of marijuana noncriminal. [Mower, ibid. 485, FN5] Does our Sheriff have authority to set plant limits? If so, where is this authority? Perhaps we patients should be asking him to cite his authority to arrest patients, disrupting lives with handcuffs, jail cells, bail bonds, attorney fees, and court hearings? Remember, our state Supreme Court held that medical marijuana is a non-criminal matter. Perhaps some of us think that SB420 enacted by our Legislature makes patients criminals via plant limits. In fact, SB420 is a voluntary regulatory program and may not repeal or amend the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 enacted by initiative of the electorate (in other words: We the People who vote). California Constitution Article10, Section 2(c). [The Legislature] may amend or repeal an initiative statute by another statute that becomes effective only when approved by the electors…. The next time a patient is arrested or their marijuana property seized by the Sheriff or other state law enforcement officer, should not we patients demand that the officers be held accountable for their unlawful activity? The Compassionate Use Act does not list any plant limits. Why are some patients negotiating plant limits with law enforcement, that is still, 8 years later, involved in unlawful activities? We appreciate you Questions, Comments and Input. Contact us at commonsenselaw@yahoo.com --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca