home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

05174047:

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 19,549 of 20,883 
 Jeff Strickland to cloud dreamer 
 Re: It looks like Obamacare is already d 
 10 Apr 13 08:04:29 
 
XPost: alt.politics.usa, rec.arts.tv.news.oreilly-factor, alt.po
itics.usa.constitution
From: crwlrjeff@yahoo.com

"cloud dreamer"  wrote in message
news:sOGdnf8yM7jKzPjMnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@supernews.com...
> On 10/04/2013 7:32 AM, John H. Gohde wrote:
>> On Apr 10, 5:47 am, Ubiquitous  wrote:
>>> Devastating new jobs report out today says that if the same number of
>>> Americans were looking for work right now, as were looking for jobs in
>>> 2009, the unemployment rate would be about 11 percent.
>>>
>>> There's no question that after trillions of taxpayer dollars have been
>>> poured into the private marketplace by the Obama administration, job
>>> growth remains awful. So why is that? The main culprit could be
>>> Obamacare which became a law in 2010 with the goal of providing health
>>> insurance to every American. The problem is that somebody has to pay for
>>> that, and business is the primary target.
>>>
>>> In my case, for example, my corporate health insurance premiums for the
>>> corporations that I run have tripled since Obamacare was passed. So
>>> millions of small business owners like me and large corporations as well
>>> are not hiring as many people because healthcare expenses are rising so
>>> quickly. It's that simple. Hiring is stunted because of federal
>>> healthcare mandates. Are we all getting this?
>>>
>>> Now some specifics, writing in "Time" magazine liberal guy Joe Klein
>>> scolding the Obama administration for not setting up promised health
>>> insurance exchanges for small businesses. In fact, 33 states can't meet
>>> Obamacare requirements in that area. The result? Chaos.
>>>
>>> But here is something even worse. The Factor has learned that the Health
>>> and Human Services agency may order the states to hire hundreds of
>>> thousands of so-called Obamacare navigators at salaries that could
>>> average more than $60,000 a year. In California alone; 21,000 navigators
>>> are estimated to be needed. And what do these people do? Well, they
>>> simply advise other Americans about how to deal with the outrageously
>>> complicated Obamacare law.
>>>
>>> According to the "Washington Post," some of these navigators are likely
>>> to come from unions as well as immigrant service and community service
>>> organizations. But here is the reality. Nobody will actually know what
>>> the navigators do because there is no objective way to measure advice.
>>> The navigators may be paid hourly with senior executives making up to
>>> $48 bucks an hour, at least that's the federal estimate.
>>>
>>> But again, what do these people actually do? This has the potential to
>>> be an enormous ruse, another colossal waste of taxpayer money.
>>>
>>> Nancy Pelosi can't explain Obamacare and some navigator in San Diego is
>>> going to figure it out? To say that Obamacare is off to a bad start is
>>> the understatement of the century.
>>>
>>> And that's "The Memo."
>>>
>>> --
>>> "The successful economic policies of Margaret Thatcher are very much
>>> relevant today. But you won't hear the press say that."
>>>          -- Bill O'Reilly
>>
>>
>>
>> YOU cannot blame moi.  I did NOT vote for Obama Salama ...
>>
>
> Yes, we can. You voted for a Republican whose only goal is to disrupt
> anything Obama does even if it destroys the lives of millions.
>
> BTW, the crap above is crap. Notice the lack of a cite.
>
>  ..

Lack of cite? Really? O'Reilly cited his own experience stating that his
costs have risen dramatically. He cites labor statistics that say if
Americans that have stopped looking for work were still in the job market,
the unemployment rate would be higher. He cites the Washington Post for how
many "navigators" will be needed, and how it will be impossible to know if
the navigators are really doing anything beyond collecting a paycheck.

What do you need to see?! The Memo segment is not "hard reporting," it is
O'Reilly's opinion of what is happening. You can debate that his opinion is
correct or not, but you have a very hard time telling us that his personal
experience is inaccurate. As for citation, he gives several -- at least one
for each point he makes.

That's the memo...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca