4fdb8b81
XPost: misc.health.alternative, sci.med.nutrition, sci.life-extension

"For those in the know, this research paper is a gold mine of information.
:)"

Yes, if one knows how to read such papers and how to put it in the context
of research generally.

"I saved it in PDF format, 3 different ways.  From this, I will be able to
better evaluate the different PDF options, available to moi.  :)"

What has format to do with it?  Do the three versions differ thereof?  The
text version was much more usable because it was internally and externally
linked.

"The full text of this study goes over at least a half dozen important
health issues, none of which I will be sharing with the predominately
@#$%^* losers on these ngs.  YOU idiots are NOT worth it.  :)"

The "issues" were in the abstract.

"Before it is all over, I will have written several different new articles
on my Web site that center around the issues raised in this paper.  I might
even write an article on methylation and aging, before it is all over."

Does anyone care?  That given the general state of the web site in
question?

"But I will say this, the presentation in this paper is obviously
incomplete.  It fails to mention the importance of CA.  It raises the ugly
specter of Folic Acid Supplementation, once again.  And, it sheds new light
on the importance of SE."

Display of ignorance of what a papere like the one in question is.

"There is colon cancer, rectal cancer, and CRC.  As far as I am concerned,
it all amounts to the same thing.  Quite frankly, it is all about
age-related cancer, IMHO.  End result, I am now less likelier than ever to
come down with age-related cancer in my lifetime, thanks to the use of my
brain; No thanks to any of the Science Psychos and other assorted losers of
all sorts on these ngs."

Hint, it ain't about you.

It is good to see one abandoning the science rant and embracing it instead.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)