From: dale@sorted.org 
  
 On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:14:27 +0100, "Dooza"  
 wrote: 
  
 >"Trist?n White"  wrote in message 
 >news:qdlfn0pko6au61um331m6djtdk878jovks@4ax.com... 
 >> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:47:59 +0100, "Dooza"  
 >> wrote: 
 >> >People have been saying that K is killing the dance floor for as long as 
 >i 
 >> >have been on UMR. But like each drug available, some people really 
 >shouldnt, 
 >> >some people need the right setting and right mind set, others love it and 
 >>  
 >> 
 >> 
 >> I know. It's one of those things I can't understand. 
 >> 
 >> K doesn't make you violent, doesn't make you appreciate music any less 
 >> (allegedly) and is non-confrontational. 
  
 No, it just makes them sleep on the dancefloor, block doorways, crash 
 into you and in my experience does make people violent (although their 
 capacity to actually hit you is severely hampered). 
  
 >> I have never felt a dancefloor has been killed by someone doing K. If 
 >> a huge majority are doing K then maybe. But if it weren't for the 
 >> whole grimy squat scene associated with K and the like, would we have 
 >> ever had acid techno? 
  
 Of course. K became popular years after acid techno did. 
  
 I remember a time when most people at acid techno parties were pretty 
 much only on E, acid or speed. Then came the special brew crew 
 followed by the ketheds. I left the scene when K took hold. Tried to 
 go back once or twice but to be honest, I can't do acid techno free 
 parties anymore. Still do plenty of acid house, trance, breaks rave 
 and psy-trance parties though. Much cleaner, nicer people, make some 
 effort at toilet control and generally better atmosphere all round. 
 (especially at the acid house & general rave parties). 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)