XPost: alt.music.makers.dj, alt.music.makers.dj.bedroom, alt.music.trance 
 XPost: uk.music.rave 
 From: this.is@spam.trap 
  
 > You get every where dontcha Tony :P 
  
 Stop following me! ;-P (I'm supposed to be on holiday) 
  
 > "Tone-EQ"  wrote in message 
 > news:3f9eaaa2$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com... 
 > > >> 3) Your MP3s will have to be ripped at 256k or better, otherwise the 
 > loss 
 > > in 
 > > >> quality will be *really* apparent on a big system. 
 > > 
 > > > Tend to disagree. 192 is fine for most but the really stubborn files 
 and 
 > > we 
 > > > play out on a 10k Court Acoustic System. Anything 'critical' rip at 
 256, 
 > > but 
 > > > obscure/rarely used tracks 192 is fine. Some of our jingles sit at 
 128. 
 > > > Depends on the material concerned - use discretion. 
 > > 
 > > Agreed. You will notice the difference between 128 and 192, but anything 
 > > over 192 is overkill, I doubt you would notice any difference for 99% of 
 > > tracks IMHO. 
 > > -- 
 > > Regards, 
 > > Tony.     (tony.cue(at)tiscali.co.uk) 
 > > 
 > > Discogs: building the definitive database of electronic music... 
 > > http://www.discogs.com 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)