From: greenyammo@blueyonder.co.uk 
  
 Slitheen wrote: 
  
 > "greenyammo"  wrote in message 
 > news:Ukaue.20000$Vo6.10211@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk... 
 > 
 >>Slitheen wrote: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>>"greenyammo"  wrote in message 
 >>>news:%1wte.15667$Vo6.8694@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk... 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>>>>Just out of interest though. Who prefers the Zygon's to the Slitheen? I 
 >>>> 
 >>>>think the sets used in the old Tom Baker stories were better than the 
 >>>>ones we have been seeing recently. The CG a few days ago looked about as 
 >>>>fake to me now as anything I saw when I was a child. 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>>Wow, where did you get your particular brand of rose tinted specs? I 
 >>>might buy some and re-watch some of my old 50's 'B movies' - they should 
 >>>look like Spielberg epics! :) 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >> 
 >>Don't knock 50's scifi. War of the worlds, The day the earth stood still, 
 >>This island earth all have production values far superior 
 >>than this series of Dr Who. 
 > 
 > 
 > I aint knocking them, I wouldn't own them if I never likd them. 
 > 
 > 
 >>It's not hard to make something look good given the budget they had for 
 >>this series. CG people get paid A LOT of money, they shouldn't have been 
 >>allowed to get away with shoddy work. As for the lighting, don't get me 
 >>started. 
 >> 
 > 
 > 
 > Go on....what's up with the lighting? :) 
 > 
 > 
 In the last episode: Randomly placed coloured lights that did nothing 
 but add garish colour to the set and look unflattering on the actors. 
 Some lighting cameramen obviously equate lots of colour with the future. 
 They also use a horrible diffusing filter on the cameras. 
 Bad DOP's often place far too many lights on set and cover their 
 cameras's with excessive filters to make up for (or distract you from) 
 the fact that they don't know what they are doing. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)