XPost: rec.arts.drwho 
 From: Ian@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk 
  
 "The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 news:d9acec$hv3$5@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 > In article <42b844da$0$290$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>, 
 > FairPlay  wrote: 
 >> 
 >>"The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 >>news:d99cv9$ppi$4@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 >>> In article <42b80cf8$0$304$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>, 
 >>> FairPlay  wrote: 
 >>> > 
 >>> >"The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 >>> >news:d98vnj$g4a$16@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 >>> >> In article , 
 >>> >> Ian Salsbury  wrote: 
 >>> >> >>>> Still, do you rate RTD's participation in DW as good as 
 >>> >> >>>> a producer's stint in the BBC Jerry Springer opera? 
 >>> >> >>>> 
 >>> >> >>> 
 >>> >> >>>Eh? 
 >>> >> >>> 
 >>> >> >>> 
 >>> >> >>> 
 >>> >> >>> 
 >>> >> >> 
 >>> >> >> Repeat, do you think RTD's participation is as good as the 
 >>> >> >> producer 
 >>> >> >> who made the Jerry Springer Opera the BBC was about to air? 
 >>> >> > 
 >>> >> >I can`t see what your`re on about here still. The Jerry Springer 
 >>> >> >Opera 
 >>> >was 
 >>> >> >aired in the BBC, got about 3 or 4 million viewers, generally very 
 >>> >positive 
 >>> >> >reviews ( it had been a hugely successful west end production ) and 
 >>> >> >a 
 >>few 
 >>> >> >hundred religious nutters threw their toys out of the pram. The vast 
 >>> >> >majority of people saw no reason to be offended by it whatsoever. 
 >>Exactly 
 >>> >> >what this has to do with RTD`s involvement in Dr Who is beyond me. 
 >>> >> >The 
 >>> >> >public reaction to Dr Who has been overwhelmingly positive, a few 
 >>people 
 >>> >> >have complained it was too scary for the timeslot ( just like the 
 >>> >> >good 
 >>> >old 
 >>> >> >days! ) but that was about it. 
 >>> >> > 
 >>> >> > 
 >>> >> > 
 >>> >> 
 >>> >> Still let us help FP.  The Christians were rotesting 
 >>> >> against  the defamation of religion, namely 
 >>> >> Chritstianity. 
 >>> >> 
 >>> >> I wonder if FP would equate RTD to such a producer. 
 >>> > 
 >>> > 
 >>> >No. 
 >>> > 
 >>> > 
 >>> 
 >>> Why?  AFAIK, the vility in JS is as bad as the innuendo in this season's 
 >>DW. 
 >> 
 >>I think you have missed one of the fundamental reasons for my objections. 
 >>Even though I have repeatedly laboured it. 
 >> 
 >>The queer/adult stuff bothers me not at all in and of itself. 
 >> 
 >>It is the fact that he has hijacked a childrens programme to promote his 
 >>propaganda. 
 >> 
 >>Geddit? 
 > 
 > Yes. 
 > 
 >> 
 >>Do I care how many times !@#$ is said in an production exclusively aimed 
 >>at 
 >>adults? 
 >>No. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 > 
 > Bible Boot camp for you mate! 
  
 I`d never heard of a bible boot camp before, is it an American thing? Just 
 done a google on it and it sounds like a quite hideous affair where young 
 kids are brainwashed into something before they`re old enough to make up 
 their own mind. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)