XPost: rec.arts.drwho 
 From: not@baker.com 
  
 In article , 
 Ian@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk says... 
 >  If the homosexuality shown in 
 > Who had been overtly done I`d agree, but just having a bisexual character 
 > and showing him to be otherwise a nice and normal chap is not a problem in 
 > my eyes. 
 > 
  
 I would agree with that point wholeheartedly and also with whoever it was 
 that called it a self indulgence on the part of the scriptwriter. The 
 gentle way it was done was fine by me but I dont see any point in doing 
 it in the first place unless theres some ulterior motive I cant see 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)