XPost: rec.arts.drwho
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article <42b94be3$0$295$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
FairPlay wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" wrote in message
>news:d9acmd$hv3$10@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article ,
>> Ian Salsbury wrote:
>> >
>> >"FairPlay" wrote in message
>> >news:42b844da$0$290$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>> >>
>> >> "The Doctor" wrote in message
>> >> news:d99cv9$ppi$4@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >>> In article <42b80cf8$0$304$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
>> >>> FairPlay wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >"The Doctor" wrote in message
>> >>> >news:d98vnj$g4a$16@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >>> >> In article ,
>> >>> >> Ian Salsbury wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>> Still, do you rate RTD's participation in DW as good as
>> >>> >> >>>> a producer's stint in the BBC Jerry Springer opera?
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>Eh?
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Repeat, do you think RTD's participation is as good as the
>producer
>> >>> >> >> who made the Jerry Springer Opera the BBC was about to air?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >I can`t see what your`re on about here still. The Jerry Springer
>> >>> >> >Opera
>> >>> >was
>> >>> >> >aired in the BBC, got about 3 or 4 million viewers, generally very
>> >>> >positive
>> >>> >> >reviews ( it had been a hugely successful west end production )
>and a
>> >> few
>> >>> >> >hundred religious nutters threw their toys out of the pram. The
>vast
>> >>> >> >majority of people saw no reason to be offended by it whatsoever.
>> >> Exactly
>> >>> >> >what this has to do with RTD`s involvement in Dr Who is beyond me.
>> >>> >> >The
>> >>> >> >public reaction to Dr Who has been overwhelmingly positive, a few
>> >> people
>> >>> >> >have complained it was too scary for the timeslot ( just like the
>> >>> >> >good
>> >>> >old
>> >>> >> >days! ) but that was about it.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Still let us help FP. The Christians were rotesting
>> >>> >> against the defamation of religion, namely
>> >>> >> Chritstianity.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I wonder if FP would equate RTD to such a producer.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >No.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> Why? AFAIK, the vility in JS is as bad as the innuendo in this
>season's
>> >> DW.
>> >>
>> >> I think you have missed one of the fundamental reasons for my
>objections.
>> >> Even though I have repeatedly laboured it.
>> >>
>> >> The queer/adult stuff bothers me not at all in and of itself.
>> >>
>> >> It is the fact that he has hijacked a childrens programme to promote
>his
>> >> propaganda.
>> >>
>> >> Geddit?
>> >>
>> >> Do I care how many times !@#$ is said in an production exclusively
>aimed
>> >> at
>> >> adults?
>> >> No.
>> >
>> >Well, I would agree with you if I thought that Dr Who HAD been hijacked
>to
>> >promote homosexuality. If there were scenes or character`s that were
>> >actively preaching to the audience that they should become gay than I
>would
>> >understand your point. But to have a character that was clearly gay but
>> >otherwise perfectly "normal" - what`s the problem? At the end of the day
>> >someone is either gay or they`re not. Someone could blabber on all day
>about
>> >the joys and wonder`s of sleeping with another man but at the end of it
>all
>> >I still wouldn`t fancy another man`s naked arse. This "promote his
>> >propaganda" line you keep using is laughable.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> And FP is inconsistent.
>
>
>No I'm not.
>
>
Afraid so. You tolerate swearing but not innuendo. To me, RTD would be
just
as good as a producer forthe Jerry Springer opera.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
nk.ca started 1 June 1995
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
