XPost: rec.arts.drwho 
 From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca 
  
 In article <42b94bcb$0$297$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>, 
 FairPlay  wrote: 
 > 
 >"The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 >news:d9acec$hv3$5@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 >> In article <42b844da$0$290$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>, 
 >> FairPlay  wrote: 
 >> > 
 >> >"The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 >> >news:d99cv9$ppi$4@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 >> >> In article <42b80cf8$0$304$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>, 
 >> >> FairPlay  wrote: 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> >"The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 >> >> >news:d98vnj$g4a$16@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 >> >> >> In article , 
 >> >> >> Ian Salsbury  wrote: 
 >> >> >> >>>> Still, do you rate RTD's participation in DW as good as 
 >> >> >> >>>> a producer's stint in the BBC Jerry Springer opera? 
 >> >> >> >>>> 
 >> >> >> >>> 
 >> >> >> >>>Eh? 
 >> >> >> >>> 
 >> >> >> >>> 
 >> >> >> >>> 
 >> >> >> >>> 
 >> >> >> >> 
 >> >> >> >> Repeat, do you think RTD's participation is as good as the 
 >producer 
 >> >> >> >> who made the Jerry Springer Opera the BBC was about to air? 
 >> >> >> > 
 >> >> >> >I can`t see what your`re on about here still. The Jerry Springer 
 >Opera 
 >> >> >was 
 >> >> >> >aired in the BBC, got about 3 or 4 million viewers, generally very 
 >> >> >positive 
 >> >> >> >reviews ( it had been a hugely successful west end production ) and 
 >a 
 >> >few 
 >> >> >> >hundred religious nutters threw their toys out of the pram. The 
 >vast 
 >> >> >> >majority of people saw no reason to be offended by it whatsoever. 
 >> >Exactly 
 >> >> >> >what this has to do with RTD`s involvement in Dr Who is beyond me. 
 >The 
 >> >> >> >public reaction to Dr Who has been overwhelmingly positive, a few 
 >> >people 
 >> >> >> >have complained it was too scary for the timeslot ( just like the 
 >good 
 >> >> >old 
 >> >> >> >days! ) but that was about it. 
 >> >> >> > 
 >> >> >> > 
 >> >> >> > 
 >> >> >> 
 >> >> >> Still let us help FP.  The Christians were rotesting 
 >> >> >> against  the defamation of religion, namely 
 >> >> >> Chritstianity. 
 >> >> >> 
 >> >> >> I wonder if FP would equate RTD to such a producer. 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> >No. 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> 
 >> >> Why?  AFAIK, the vility in JS is as bad as the innuendo in this 
 >season's 
 >> >DW. 
 >> > 
 >> >I think you have missed one of the fundamental reasons for my objections. 
 >> >Even though I have repeatedly laboured it. 
 >> > 
 >> >The queer/adult stuff bothers me not at all in and of itself. 
 >> > 
 >> >It is the fact that he has hijacked a childrens programme to promote his 
 >> >propaganda. 
 >> > 
 >> >Geddit? 
 >> 
 >> Yes. 
 >> 
 >> > 
 >> >Do I care how many times !@#$ is said in an production exclusively aimed 
 >at 
 >> >adults? 
 >> >No. 
 >> > 
 >> > 
 >> > 
 >> > 
 >> 
 >> Bible Boot camp for you mate! 
 > 
 >Maybe so. But I draw a distinction between adult "issues" being aimed at 
 >adults and the same being aimed at children. 
 > 
  
 You have a double standard.  To me , if you are anti-homosexual, 
 you are anti-swearing as well. 
  
 Yes, DW is a Children's show and show be devoid of adult/sexual innuendo. 
  
 The innuendo belongs to the Porn Industry. 
 -- 
 Member - Liberal International  
 This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca 
 God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! 
 nk.ca started 1 June 1995 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)