home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZUK4449             uk.media.tv.sf.drwho             32000 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 31698 of 32031 on ZZUK4449, Friday 2-23-23, 4:01  
  From: JOHN RUSSELL  
  To: GREENYAMMO  
  Subj: Re: Was I the only one who thought that   
 From: john_e_russell@hotmail.com 
  
 "greenyammo"  wrote in message 
 news:bvcte.37880$Vj3.2257@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk... 
 > RTD is a rubbish science fiction writer. Yet again he resolves one of his 
 > stories with the use of the SAME imaginary device. 
 > How are they going to get out of that one? RTD can't figure it out so he 
 > just makes up something unexplainable and figures that we'll all buy into 
 > it. It's tantamount to saying "It was all a dream" - absolutely appalling, 
 > lazy writing. The ending was like the sonic screwdriver times a billion. 
 > 
 > The lighting was garish in the last episode and the sets were a joke. I 
 > have never seen sets so bad in Dr Who before (and they even wobbled 
 > yesterday). They were all big black spaces with a few props/walls lying 
 > around. They had no sense of reality they obviously spent the budget on 
 > those flying Daleks. 
 > 
 > I think the series has been a mixed bunch but RTD should stick to 
 > overseeing the show (which he seems good at) and leave the writing to 
 > somebody more capable, Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss preferably. 
 > 
 > Writing about "Big Brother" etc is just going to look horribly dated in 
 > ten years time. Doctor Who is by it's very nature timeless but RTD seems 
 > to want to ground it to a specific year so badly for no good reason. 
 > 
 > Very, very disapointed with that. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
  
 Timeless? Dr Who looked dated as soon as Star Wars was released. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,098 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca