XPost: rec.arts.drwho 
 From: not@home.com 
  
 "The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 news:d9acec$hv3$5@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 > In article <42b844da$0$290$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>, 
 > FairPlay  wrote: 
 > > 
 > >"The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 > >news:d99cv9$ppi$4@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 > >> In article <42b80cf8$0$304$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>, 
 > >> FairPlay  wrote: 
 > >> > 
 > >> >"The Doctor"  wrote in message 
 > >> >news:d98vnj$g4a$16@gallifrey.nk.ca... 
 > >> >> In article , 
 > >> >> Ian Salsbury  wrote: 
 > >> >> >>>> Still, do you rate RTD's participation in DW as good as 
 > >> >> >>>> a producer's stint in the BBC Jerry Springer opera? 
 > >> >> >>>> 
 > >> >> >>> 
 > >> >> >>>Eh? 
 > >> >> >>> 
 > >> >> >>> 
 > >> >> >>> 
 > >> >> >>> 
 > >> >> >> 
 > >> >> >> Repeat, do you think RTD's participation is as good as the 
 producer 
 > >> >> >> who made the Jerry Springer Opera the BBC was about to air? 
 > >> >> > 
 > >> >> >I can`t see what your`re on about here still. The Jerry Springer 
 Opera 
 > >> >was 
 > >> >> >aired in the BBC, got about 3 or 4 million viewers, generally very 
 > >> >positive 
 > >> >> >reviews ( it had been a hugely successful west end production ) and 
 a 
 > >few 
 > >> >> >hundred religious nutters threw their toys out of the pram. The 
 vast 
 > >> >> >majority of people saw no reason to be offended by it whatsoever. 
 > >Exactly 
 > >> >> >what this has to do with RTD`s involvement in Dr Who is beyond me. 
 The 
 > >> >> >public reaction to Dr Who has been overwhelmingly positive, a few 
 > >people 
 > >> >> >have complained it was too scary for the timeslot ( just like the 
 good 
 > >> >old 
 > >> >> >days! ) but that was about it. 
 > >> >> > 
 > >> >> > 
 > >> >> > 
 > >> >> 
 > >> >> Still let us help FP.  The Christians were rotesting 
 > >> >> against  the defamation of religion, namely 
 > >> >> Chritstianity. 
 > >> >> 
 > >> >> I wonder if FP would equate RTD to such a producer. 
 > >> > 
 > >> > 
 > >> >No. 
 > >> > 
 > >> > 
 > >> 
 > >> Why?  AFAIK, the vility in JS is as bad as the innuendo in this 
 season's 
 > >DW. 
 > > 
 > >I think you have missed one of the fundamental reasons for my objections. 
 > >Even though I have repeatedly laboured it. 
 > > 
 > >The queer/adult stuff bothers me not at all in and of itself. 
 > > 
 > >It is the fact that he has hijacked a childrens programme to promote his 
 > >propaganda. 
 > > 
 > >Geddit? 
 > 
 > Yes. 
 > 
 > > 
 > >Do I care how many times !@#$ is said in an production exclusively aimed 
 at 
 > >adults? 
 > >No. 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > 
 > Bible Boot camp for you mate! 
  
 Maybe so. But I draw a distinction between adult "issues" being aimed at 
 adults and the same being aimed at children. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)