XPost: rec.arts.drwho
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article <42b80cd9$0$297$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
FairPlay wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" wrote in message
>news:d98vjn$g4a$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <42b7ccca$0$290$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
>> FairPlay wrote:
>> >
>> >"The Doctor" wrote in message
>> >news:d97jaj$47c$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> In article <42b6e7bf$0$292$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
>> >> FairPlay wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >"The Doctor" wrote in message
>> >> >news:d96j8o$bar$20@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> >> In article <42b6ba17$0$289$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
>> >> >> FairPlay wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >"The Doctor" wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:d94lsn$sqg$37@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >>
>> >> >> >The gay/unsuitable references, the commercial placements and the
>> >> >plagiarisms
>> >> >> >were there for all to see.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Noted.
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> You are welcome
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >First we had the outraged denials, the accusations that I was
>> >trolling.
>> >> >Then
>> >> >> >episode after episode as the evidence built up we had the
>> >somersaulting
>> >> >> >denials - then the absurd justifications.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Some people buy into the politically correct agenda.
>> >> >
>> >> >Indeed.
>> >>
>> >> Such is the current world.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It really was dumbed down dross. If he wasn't trying to insert his
>> >> >political
>> >> >> >propaganda it would have just been another BBC production of dumbed
>> >down
>> >> >> >dross.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Are you saying the BBC has been infiltrated by the Politically
>correct?
>> >> >
>> >> >Uhm. I think I've said it about 4,000 times.
>> >>
>> >> Yes would do.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >As it was it was much more insidious than that and quite worrying
>that
>> >he
>> >> >> >could get away with it so easily.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Write to the BBC and complain.
>> >> >
>> >> >Why? What good would it do? The BBC is a self-satisfied corporation
>> >> >seemingly answerable to no one but itself. It is in the vanguard of
>> >> >producing dumbed down TV. Others in positions of influence have
>> >complained
>> >> >repeatedly over time. Seems to have had no effect on the decay.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> 1) Powell was a bully.
>> >>
>> >> 2) Yentob tried but the Yanks would not play
>> >>
>> >> 3) Lorraine got it back, and now is the time for feedback.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >The "gay" stuff was trailed as were teh kisses and the big brotehr
>> >stuff.
>> >> >> >RTD knew exactly what he was doing - exploiting the morons and he
>got
>> >> >> >exactly the effect he wanted. Cheap publicity.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Again bring this up with the BBC.
>> >> >
>> >> >Why? What good would it do?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Explain how offended you fell and see if change would happen.
>> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It's no surpise the gays/fanboys here lapped it up.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Such as it is.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >And in a way no surprise the BBC got good ratings ( relatively).
>They
>> >> >hyped
>> >> >> >it mercilesly and the public have a lot of goodwill towards the DW
>> >> >> >franchise.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> DW is a success, even when Powell thought it was passe.
>> >> >
>> >> >I can't deny that it has received *relatively* good viewing figures.
>> >Doesn't
>> >> >make it a success in my book.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> The fans make the show a success.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >The public have been starved of meaningful, involving storylines in
>> >much
>> >> >> >mainstream TV so why should DW be different and why would they
>employ
>> >a
>> >> >> >critical eye given the above?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Critical critique is what it is about.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >The whole Bad Wolfe thing? WHat a load of !@#$e. It was nothing
>really
>> >> >was
>> >> >> >it! A superficial attempt at some sort of deeper storyline - but
>> >anyone
>> >> >> >could have though that up on the back of a !@# packet.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Well the destruction of Gallifrey?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The BW references were not integral to the earlier storylines were
>> >they?
>> >> >> >Just tacked on to give some sort of counterfeit depth and
>> >sophistication.
>> >> >> >!@#$%^&*.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have yet to see BW/TPotW
>> >> >
>> >> >Judge by the earlier episodes.
>> >>
>> >> I prefer to see for myself.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Without the exploitative offal he wallowed in, I would have said
>the
>> >> >series
>> >> >> >was simply par for the course average production for the under 14s
>> >which
>> >> >> >reflects the here and now. It will have absolutely no staying power
>> >and
>> >> >will
>> >> >> >become extremely dated very quickly.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Timefor RTD to go on that note.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Anyone over about 14 who actually got something out of it - execpt
>for
>> >a
>> >> >> >cheap and nasty SF fix - I would suggest is either mentally
>retarded
>> >or
>> >> >> >queer.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You are entitled to your opinion.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As for my summary, in 9 to 10 days time.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Still, do you rate RTD's participation in DW as good as
>> >> >> a producer's stint in the BBC Jerry Springer opera?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Eh?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Repeat, do you think RTD's participation is as good as the producer
>> >> who made the Jerry Springer Opera the BBC was about to air?
>> >
>> >Nope - still dont get it. BTW JP was aired in the UK
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> JP??
>>
>> Still then you are not familiar with the Springer Opera that was suppose
>> to air on the BBC.
>
>
>typo JS.
>
>Look JS aired on UK tv can't remember the channel.
>
>But if you wish me to address an issue you will have to be more explicit as
>I haven't a clue what you are talking about.
>
>
All right, as a producer of this type of show, would you not
be asshamed?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
nk.ca started 1 June 1995
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
