XPost: rec.arts.drwho 
 From: nickSPAMMENOT@snurcker.com 
  
 FairPlay wrote: 
 >Ian Salsbury wrote: 
 >> 
 >> Well, I would agree with you if I thought that Dr Who HAD been 
 >> hijacked to promote homosexuality. If there were scenes or 
 >> character`s that were actively preaching to the audience that they 
 >> should become gay than I would understand your point. But to have a 
 >> character that was clearly gay but otherwise perfectly "normal" - 
 >> what`s the problem? At the end of the day someone is either gay or 
 >> they`re not. Someone could blabber on all day about the joys and 
 >> wonder`s of sleeping with another man but at the end of it all I 
 >> still wouldn`t fancy another man`s naked arse. This "promote his 
 >> propaganda" line you keep using is laughable. 
 > 
 > It really isn't - as I'm sure you know. He set his stall out very 
 > early. To start with the refuseniks told me I was paranoid or 
 > trolling or making the homosexual references up. 
 > 
 > Now we have this laughable defence that some characters "just 
 > happened" to be gay. 
  
 How do we know any of the characters are gay? 
 I haven't seen any sex on the screen. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)