XPost: rec.arts.drwho
From: Ian@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk
"The Doctor" wrote in message
news:d99d2m$ppi$6@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <42b80d38$0$289$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
> FairPlay wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" wrote in message
>>news:d9900v$g4a$22@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <42b7f54d$0$302$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>,
>>> FairPlay wrote:
>>> >
>>> >"Ian Salsbury" wrote in message
>>> >news:d98kt1$q26$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>> >> >>> Still, do you rate RTD's participation in DW as good as
>>> >> >>> a producer's stint in the BBC Jerry Springer opera?
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>Eh?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Repeat, do you think RTD's participation is as good as the producer
>>> >> > who made the Jerry Springer Opera the BBC was about to air?
>>> >>
>>> >> I can`t see what your`re on about here still. The Jerry Springer
>>> >> Opera
>>was
>>> >> aired in the BBC, got about 3 or 4 million viewers, generally very
>>> >positive
>>> >> reviews ( it had been a hugely successful west end production ) and a
>>few
>>> >> hundred religious nutters threw their toys out of the pram. The vast
>>> >> majority of people saw no reason to be offended by it whatsoever.
>>Exactly
>>> >> what this has to do with RTD`s involvement in Dr Who is beyond me.
>>> >> The
>>> >> public reaction to Dr Who has been overwhelmingly positive, a few
>>people
>>> >> have complained it was too scary for the timeslot ( just like the
>>> >> good
>>old
>>> >> days! ) but that was about it.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >lol.
>>> >
>>> >You have a censored mind.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> Explain that one.
>>
>>It aint hard. He missed out around 4,234,087 valid reasons.
>>
>>
>>
>
> In other word he has a closed mind.
Why exactly? I just said that nothing in the Jerry Springer opera or the new
Dr Who series offended me, I was happy to embrace both. How does that equate
to me having a closed mind?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|