
| Msg # 495 of 12811 on ZZUK4448, Wednesday 9-16-25, 1:18 |
| From: JOHN |
| To: NICK ODELL |
| Subj: Re: Holiday pay / NMW and a likely near |
From: megane.06@gmail.com On 15/09/2025 00:10, Nick Odell wrote: > May I muddy the waters here? You only mention the word "employee" in > your follow-up post. Does this person actually receive a payslip > weekly/monthly/whatever with an employee reference and NI number? > > The majority of taxi firms around here contract self-employed drivers > and don't actually pay wages as such. Of course, a payslip would > settle it, but in the absence of a payslip is it possible that whilst > the driver has been paid for services at the rate of the NMW they have > not actually been an employee? That would, in my opinion, make sense > of the list of benefits they are not receiving. Given that she was only earning about €€4000 a year, I assumed this was an escort rather than a driver. As you say most drivers will be self employed but if they were on a wage, I would expect it to be much higher. > I was under the impression that TUPE applied to employees when a new > owner takes over a company or staff are transferred to a new company. > I'm not sure how the LA awarding a contract to a different taxi firm > has anything to do with it - unless taxi firm B is taking on the > employees of taxi firm A in the process. Either way, I don't see how > it is the LA's responsibility. They are just the customer, not the > employer/contractor. I agree with you. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,127 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca