[continued from previous message] 
  
 > You were doubting if he was Palestinian. When it was shown that he was, 
 > you decided to bring up the irrelevant subject of Cappadocia in a futile 
 > attempt to distract from the actual topic. 
  
 Cappadocia is only irrelevant to those who, for whatever reason, want St 
 George to be from  €€€Palestinia€€€ (a province created by the Romans in 
 which 
 to put the - to the Romans - troublesome Jews) instead of his birthplace in 
 Cappadocia. 
  
 Just think what that implies. 
  
 And so far no-one has put forward any reasonable grounds for St George 
 being €€€Palestinian€€€. 
  
 >> JFTR, this subthread originated with the post that said €€€You are aware 
 that 
 >> the flag of the Feast of St. George - a Palestinian celebration - is also 
 >> the St. Georges flag ? These numbnuts are busy decorating England with *a* 
 >> Palestinian flag.€€€ 
 >> 
 >> You then included the following in a later post €€€If you really like AI 
 >> though, if you ask Google "Was St George Palestinian?" its AI's answer 
 >> begins "Yes".€€€ 
 > 
 > Which it does. I only mentioned it because you seemed to place 
 > unwarranted value on the garbage that AI outputs. 
  
 Well, AI turned up St George€€€s Cappadocian roots (father and place of 
 birth) which seems to have resulted in your falling back on making 
 unsupported statements, so it can€€€t be all bad. 
  
 >> As has now been demonstrated, this is a minor part - or, given the lack of 
 >> knowledge of 3C AD Cappadocian law, possibly no part at all - of St 
 >> George€€€s legal status regarding his Cappadocian connection. 
  
 > Every part of that sentence is false. 
  
 Every part of that sentence is true. 
  
 -- 
 Spike 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)