
| Msg # 415 of 12811 on ZZUK4448, Monday 8-31-25, 1:17 |
| From: CLIVE PAGE |
| To: SPIKE |
| Subj: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFRoZSBCZWxsIEhvdGVsOiBhbi |
From: usenet@page2.eu On 29/08/2025 11:08, Spike wrote: > Why can the UK not adopt the EU approach to solving the economic migrant > issue? What is it about the legal system here that upholds the current > interminable modus? Can it be changed? Will it change? Should it change? We had that when we were EU members because of the Dublin Agreement - which required asylum-seekers to seek asylum in the first safe country they reached. France was deemed by the UK to be a "safe" country for this purpose, and we did return significant numbers of people to France. As soon as we left the EU we also lost the ability to make use of the Dublin Agreement. It wasn't a coincidence that the numbers crossing the channel in small boats then rose hugely. You may think it ironic that what is called the small boats crisis is largely of Farage's making. Of course he is now trying to become PM on the strength of solving a crisis that he created. I wonder if this was part of his plan all along, but that may be crediting him with more advance planning then he is capable of. I am not a LibDem supporter but find it interesting that the only UK politician to have talked recently about the unfortunate effects of the Dublin Agreement is Ed Davey. It's obvious to him and to me how to solve the problem in the long term: simply rejoin the EU. -- Clive Page --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,124 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca