home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZUK4448             uk.legal.moderated             12811 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 333 of 12811 on ZZUK4448, Tuesday 9-22-25, 1:14  
  From: NORMAN WELLS  
  To: ROGER HAYTER  
  Subj: Re: Projecting images onto buildings - w  
 From: hex@unseen.ac.am 
  
 On 20/09/2025 23:32, Roger Hayter wrote: 
 > On 20 Sep 2025 at 21:06:08 BST, "Mark Goodge" 
 >  wrote: 
  
 > Are you aware of any effective remedies for the unapproved display of any 
 of 
 > these kinds of advertisement for less than a day? 
  
 The term 'remedy' implies something unlawful for which a remedy is 
 required, which is yet to be established. 
  
 The term 'advertisement' requires there to have been an 'advertisement', 
 which is very dubious and also yet to be established. 
  
 The term 'unapproved' implies that some sort of approval was required, 
 which is yet another factor that is yet to be established. 
  
 Is there any reason why such activity as occurred in Windsor should in 
 principle be illegal?  If not, perhaps Parliament did not intend it to 
 be so.  Perhaps it's just unthinking, controlling busybodies who think 
 it should have been stopped. 
  
 It may explain why the police and even some here have been floundering 
 and flapping around to find all manner of spurious legal grounds that 
 don't actually exist. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,107 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca