
| Msg # 312 of 12811 on ZZUK4448, Tuesday 9-22-25, 1:14 |
| From: ROGER HAYTER |
| To: JNUGENT |
| Subj: Re: Projecting images onto buildings - w |
[continued from previous message] >>>>>> A much more fruitful approach might be to look at the fact that >>>>>> generally >>>>>> you need to be on public land to pull of such an event, and that is >>>>>> probably already covered by a mountain of laws, by-laws and >>>>>> regulations >>>>>> that any number of agencies are able to enforce. >>>>> >>>>> As I said, both in the original post and this one, it is covered by >>>>> planning >>>>> law. The specific problem is that planning law is entirely toothless >>>>> against >>>>> this kind of very short-term projection, as it will never reach the >>>>> threshold for prosecution. Which means that people can use >>>>> projectors in >>>>> this way with total impunity. >>>> >>>> Which may of course have been Parliament's intention. >>>> >>>>>> We really don't want to go down the US route of banning ideas - which >>>>>> they have just done. Because it can make you look a bit stupid. >>>>> >>>>> It's nothing to do with banning ideas. Just addressing a loophole which >>>>> allows people to circumvent the law for the purposes of advertising. >>>>> What >>>>> they are advertising has nothing to do with it. >>> >>>> It still has to be 'advertising'. >>> >>> Have you looked up "advertise"? >> >> Yes. Have you looked up my previous post on its meaning? With references. > > I don't need to. I am well aware that the word was not invented in 1955 > with the coming of ITV. Shakespeare used it. >> >> Perhaps you'd say why you think the police took no action under what you >> are arguing, but under a completely different head. > > If they had a better basis for proceeding, all the better. I'm not > complaining. They certainly had no basis for proceeding on the basis of advertising without planning permission - it would need a planning decision and enforcement action by the council department first! -- Roger Hayter --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,120 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca