From: JNugent73@mail.com
On 22/09/2025 11:25 AM, billy bookcase wrote:
> "billy bookcase" wrote in message news:10a381
$8lle$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> "John Levine" wrote in message news:10a24qt
2nnu$1@gal.iecc.com...
>>> According to Roland Perry :
>>>>> which of these addresses have you lived at at some point in the past 50
>>>>> years ...
>>>
>>> True story: I live in the US, but I used to have an EE SIM that I used
when I
>>> was in the UK. On one trip I arrived, tried to top up using their web
site,
>>> didn't work, oh well, I'll sort it out later. On the train to Cambridge
the
>>> phone rang with a call from an Irish number. "Hello", said an Irish
voice,
"this
>>> is EE and we need to verify that it's you who tried to do the top-up with
some
>>> verification questions."
>>>
>>> "OK, but I live in the U.S."
>>>
>>> "That's not a problem."
>>>
>>> We ran through a few questions, with the final one being:
>>>
>>> "In which U.S. state did you live in 1964?"
>>>
>>> "In *1964*?!?!?"
>>>
>>> "Oh, if you don't remember, we can try something else."
>>>
>>> "Of course I remember, I was ten years old."
>>>
>>> So I correctly identified the state and my top-up went through.
>>>
>>> How in the world did they know where I lived in 1964?
>>
>> They didn't.
>>
>> However if they ever call you again, or you call them, they'll expect
>> you to give the same answer
>
> Or if they've already called a scammer who is pretending to be you, then
> you're really in the sh*t. To use the technical term
>
> This chap, a special needs teacher was the victim of identity theft;
> whereby three fraudulent claims were made in his name for Universal
> Credit. One involved a face to face interview in Crewe including
> the production of a passport; when he could prove he was actually
> hundreds of miles away at the time
>
> The first thing he knew of this, was when he noticed the DWP had been
> regularly deducting payments from his salary for a €763 advance, which
> they claim was paid into a bank account in his name
>
>
> quote:
>
> Bene also said that often agents will refuse to speak to him because
> he does not know the answer to the security questions that the scammer
> set up on his account, which has created €a truly Kafkaesque barrier€.
>
> €It€s just like going around in circles,€ he said. €They will refuse
> to speak to me because they€re still using the details of the fraudulent
> claim and the two security questions that were created by the fraudulent
> claimant as the basis of their verification process; it€s comical.€
>
> €So obviously, I don€t know the answer to those questions,€ he added.
> €I mean, I know what the questions are, because I keep on asking,
> it€s €what colour was your first car?€ and €where did you go on your
> first holiday?€ I don€t even drive, I€ve never driven, so I don€t
> have a car.€
>
> :unquote
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/sep/22/turned-my-life-i
to-hell-teacher-fights-to-clear-his-name-after-identity
His first port of call should have been his own MP. The second: the
Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (the "Ombudsman").
Classic Ombudsman case.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|