[continued from previous message] 
  
 >>> this kind of very short-term projection, as it will never reach the 
 >>> threshold for prosecution. Which means that people can use projectors in 
 >>> this way with total impunity. 
 >> 
 >> Which may of course have been Parliament's intention. 
 >> 
 >>>> We really don't want to go down the US route of banning ideas - which 
 >>>> they have just done. Because it can make you look a bit stupid. 
 >>> 
 >>> It's nothing to do with banning ideas. Just addressing a loophole which 
 >>> allows people to circumvent the law for the purposes of advertising. 
 >>> What 
 >>> they are advertising has nothing to do with it. 
 > 
 >> It still has to be 'advertising'. 
 > 
 > Have you looked up "advertise"? 
  
 Yes.  Have you looked up my previous post on its meaning?  With references. 
  
 Perhaps you'd say why you think the police took no action under what you 
 are arguing, but under a completely different head. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)