From: JNugent73@mail.com
On 05/09/2025 02:12 PM, The Todal wrote:
> On 05/09/2025 11:45, JNugent wrote:
>> On 05/09/2025 09:56 AM, Roger Hayter wrote:
>>> On 4 Sep 2025 at 23:28:00 BST, "JNugent" wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/09/2025 11:07 PM, The Todal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/09/2025 12:14, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/09/2025 11:45 AM, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-09-04, Clive Page wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One can see that if you are police officer it's a much more
>>>>>>>> exciting
>>>>>>>> way to spend your day dashing onto the runway at Heathrow in a car
>>>>>>>> with blue lights flashing along with four colleagues all
>>>>>>>> brandishing
>>>>>>>> guns than trying to investigating a real crime, which might, for
>>>>>>>> example, involve watching a lot of boring CCTV footage. So one
>>>>>>>> can see their point of view, it's just not something that most of
>>>>>>>> the public would support.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did any of that actually happen, or did you make it up?
>>>>>
>>>>>> You haven't been following the news, then?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anyone quote the post that Mr Linehan made, that attracted the
>>>>> attention of the police?
>>>>
>>>> Not I, and that's for certain. It was on Twitter / X, wasn't it?
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone actually take any notice of it?
>>>>
>>>> As for the man himself, I am not much of a fan. Well, except for
>>>> "The IT
>>>> Crowd", which sounded as though it was written by an adult with a sense
>>>> of humour, as opposed to "Father Ted" which can only have been written
>>>> by a precocious 13 year old who thought that using swear words made any
>>>> old tripe into something funny.
>>>>
>>>>> The fact that he's famous or a comedy writer isn't really relevant.
>>>>>
>>>> It shouldn't be. But one can hardly overlook the possibility that it
>>>> definitely was not irrelevant in this particular case.
>>>>
>>>>> If he was taunting or harassing a specific trans person, he fully
>>>>> deserves to be arrested and questioned >
>>>>
>>>> Does he? Is what you say he did worse than "taunting or harassing"
>>>> anyone else?
>>>>
>>>>> - whether he has committed an offence is for the CPS to judge.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure your typing of "CPS" was a muscle memory typo for "jury".
>>>
>>> If the CPS doesn't think he has committed an offence it won't ever
>>> get to a
>>> court.
>>
>> That is not their test. They authorise a charge if it is in the public
>> interest and if they think that there is a better than 50% chance of
>> getting a conviction.
>>
>> But the first part of that test is what would be more important here.
>>
>> In what way would it ever be in the public interest to elevate an
>> argument into a criminal matter?
>>
>
> Did you know that there exists a criminal offence of harassment?
Yes.
>
> https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents
>
And?
Is an argument an act of harrassment?
Are you harrassing me right now (or I you)?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|