uk: 
 berlin. 
 x=1762877505; b= 
 V1FHvYunTydntVIp5rboHZzKoj7 
 Received: 
 Z4Z58dyNtm/ 
 hme4QRIr/ 
 From: norman@myard.uk 
  
 JNugent  Wrote in message:r 
 > On 04/11/2025 11:00 am, Pamela wrote 
  
 >> Apart from considerations of criminal damage, isn't the JSO Stonehenge 
 incident covered by "Intentionally or recklessly causing public nuisance" 
 as defined here:  Section 78 of Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 
 2022: 
  
 >>    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/32/section/78 
  
 > Even better. 
  
 People are charged with what the police and CPS consider the most 
  appropriate.  That is all they have to answer to. 
  
 -- 
  
  
 ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- 
 https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)