uk: 
 header. 
 Received: 
 From: max_demian@bigfoot.com 
  
 On 04/11/2025 22:13, Martin Harran wrote: 
 > On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 19:32:30 +0000, The Todal  
 > wrote: 
  
 >> How about a more commonplace example: friendship with a good friend or 
 >> family member who was in trouble with the police for downloading 
 >> indecent photographs of children? And who was in huge distress because 
 >> it meant the end of his marriage and his career and his contact with his 
 >> children, and a likely prison sentence? 
 >> 
 >> Would your friendship be wholly dependent on hearing a form of words 
 >>from him that satisfied you that he repented of his actions? 
 > 
 > First and foremost, I would want to be certain that he is no longer a 
 > threat to children. 
  
 Except that access to the pictures (which, according to current law, 
 could be age old, cartoons or even AI generated) must be regarded as 
 lessening his "threat to children". 
  
 How do think that sexual desire works? 
  
 -- 
 Max Demian 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)