From: JNugent73@mail.com
On 11/08/2025 07:17 AM, Norman Wells wrote:
> On 10/08/2025 23:43, Roger Hayter wrote:
>> On 10 Aug 2025 at 23:20:45 BST, "Norman Wells" wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/08/2025 22:15, billy bookcase wrote:
>>>> "The Todal" wrote in message
>>>> news:mfsc9uFs6deU3@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yvette Cooper thanked police for their work handling Palestine rights
>>>>> protests across
>>>>> the UK on Saturday, saying there had been a "very small number of
>>>>> people
>>>>> whose actions
>>>>> crossed the line into criminality".
>>>>>
>>>>> unquote
>>>>>
>>>>> Which implies that many people were arrested for actions that
>>>>> didn't cross
>>>>> the line
>>>>> into criminality.
>>>>
>>>> Which also clearly indicates that the Home Secretary is quite
>>>> willing to
>>>> prejudge issues of criminality; which formerly were the sole
>>>> province of
>>>> the Courts to decide
>>>
>>> Which of course they will in due course, if any charges are actually
>>> brought.
>>>
>>> There is very little doubt that the vast majority at least of those
>>> arrested were strictly breaking the law which says:
>>>
>>> "A person commits an offence if the person€€€
>>>
>>> (a) expresses an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed
>>> organisation, and
>>>
>>> (b) in doing so is reckless as to whether a person to whom the
>>> expression is directed will be encouraged to support a proscribed
>>> organisation."
>>>
>>> The law is framed in such a way that it encompasses holding a placard
>>> expressing support of Palestine Action, which the many arrested
>>> 'terrorist offenders' did directly and deliberately.
>>>
>>> The main purpose of their protest in my view, however, was not to do
>>> anything about Palestine, which no-one here can, but to show the absurd
>>> nature of the law by getting arrested for peacefully exerting their
>>> right to freedom of expression, which is an admirable and honourable
>>> aim.
>>>
>>> "In a post on X shortly after 6.45pm on Sunday, Defend Our Juries said
>>> every person arrested in the square had been released from police
>>> custody, and that none had been charged."
>>>
>>> https://news.sky.com/story/more-than-500-people-arrested-aft
r-palestine-action-protest-with-about-a-half-aged-60-and-above-13409747
>>>
>>>
>>> That sounds to me like 532 unwarranted arrests for which someone needs
>>> to be accountable.
>>>
>>> Now I hope the government will be held to account for the
>>> heavy-handedness of the police, the very large number of arrests that
>>> came to nothing, the cost of them and the relocation of other prisoners
>>> (which I'm paying for incidentally), and indeed having such a law at all
>>> that either can't be or won't be enforced.
>>>
>>> The whole situation is a ludicrous shambles. The government is to
>>> blame, and it needs to do something about it urgently. Does it really
>>> believe in freedom of expression and the right to protest peacefully or
>>> doesn't it?
>>
>> Clearly it does not so believe.
>
> So, Yvette Cooper, our Home Secretary, is a lying hypocrite then when
> she says 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely'?
>
> Thought so. Sadly.
One protests by using WORDS, whether orally or in print.
Not by damaging property.
Criminal Damage is... er... a crime.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|