From: roger@hayter.org
On 7 Aug 2025 at 18:04:12 BST, "Jethro_uk" wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 16:55:23 +0000, Roger Hayter wrote:
>
>> On 7 Aug 2025 at 14:23:51 BST, "JNugent" wrote:
>>
>>> [quoted text muted]
>>
>> If it were a religious belief (as defined by the courts) it would not
>> have to prove that it was worthy of respect in a democratic society.
>> Indeed, many religious beliefs aren't. The Grainger tests apply to
>> non-religious beliefs.
>
> What is a religious belief, then ?
As far as I know it is up to a court faced with a claim of discrimination
against someone because of religious belief to decide, inter alia, if theirs
is a genuine religious belief. Guided by previous cases, but not by a
statutory definition. They will no doubt have the dictionary definition(s)
in
mind, but that is only a start.
--
Roger Hayter
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|