From: max_demian@bigfoot.com
On 09/08/2025 13:32, billy bookcase wrote:
> "Max Demian" wrote in message
> news:10778cb$18020$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 08/08/2025 17:45, billy bookcase wrote:
>>> "Max Demian" wrote in message
>>> news:1074t4b$no99$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 07/08/2025 21:24, billy bookcase wrote:
>>>>> "Jeff Gaines" wrote in message
>>>>> news:xn0p99pwb94sjja00z@news.individual.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>> If we do have that then what is the equivalent of antisemitism for
Arabs or Scots
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> Methodists? I think we are talking about race with antisemitism not
religion as I
>>>>>> mistakenly thought.
>>>>>
>>>>> People who just hate Jews aren't fussy.
>>>>>
>>>>> It really is as simple as that.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is unimpeachable historical evidence of people persecuting
>>>>> and latterly murdering large numbers of Jews going back over
>>>>> 1000 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unlike any other group of people.
>>>>
>>>> No, Jews are just "special", for some reason.
>>>
>>> Yes as I just said; they've been persecuted for at least the last 1000
years
>>
>> That's (mostly) ancient history,
>
> Apart from brushing aside the murder of 6 million Jews only
> 60 odd years ago, you've clearly never heard of the Russian
> Pogroms of the 19th and early 20th Century either
>
> Or why as a result, the East End of London was populated by so many
> Jewish people, that that's where Oswald Moseley chose to hold his
> aborted march
>
>> and more than compensated by the murderous behaviour of the state
>> of Israel since it was created.
>
> There happens to be a bit of a difference between turning people
> into refugees; and pushing them into gas chambers.
OK. Shooting, starving, allowing "settlers" to kill them and take their
property without any penalty; demolishing their homes, imprisoning them
in the thousands...
>>>> I can understand Germans with their "war guilt", but we've got noting
to
>>>> be ashamed of,
>>>
>>> So you're saying that Jews were never persecuted in Britain ?
>>>
>>> And that it wasn't a British Foreign Secretary, Arthur Balfour who
>>> issued a Statement on behalf of the British Government in 1917,
>>> announcing its support for the establishment of a "National Home
>>> for the Jewish people"in Palestine,
>>>
>>> Which is basically what helped kicked the whole thing off 30 years years
>>> later; when Britain was still administering Palestine
>>
>> Apparently Balfour was (to some extent) motivated by antisemitism and a
desire to
>> remove Jews from Britain, like (some) Germans before WW2. (Palestine was
one German
>> suggestion, together with Madagascar.)
>
> Well done. It's nice to see that at least some people are paying attention
>
> quote:
>
> "billy bookcase" wrote in message news:106oe9
$1pkkg$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> Many of whom have regarded Zionism as simply serving the interests of
>> Anti-Semites who merely wished to rid Europe of its Jews. A "First
Solution"
>> if you like. With the Balfour Declaration simply formalising that ambition
>
> :unquote
>
>
>
>>> > unlike
>>>> Israelis/Zionists and their supporters/apologists in every synagogue
world wide.
>>>
>>> What exactly has any of that got to do with anti-semitism ?
>>
>> Rabbis could be asked whether they support the murder of Arabs.
>
> And what exactly has that got to do with anti-semitism ?
>
> As I suggested before, many Jews are not even practising and so
> may never have talked to a Rabbi.
>
> hint: because the first thing the Rabbi would ask them, is why they
> no longer attended the Synagogue
>
> And as I also said, Anti-Semites just aren't fussy. They hate all Jews;
> regardless of whether they know any Rabbis or not.
>
> Same with the Nazis. It was your grandparents that counted as to whether
> you ended up being gassed or not. Not whether you knew any Rabbis.
>
>>
>>> And the fact that Jews have been persecuted for over the last 1000
years ?
>>
>> History, as I noted above.
>>
>>> And an easy target in their role as being Gods Chosen People for every
>>> Country or individual who simply can't face up to the fact that they've
>>> been abject failures in life*; and so are thrashing around for somebody
>>> else to blame.
>>>
>>> In a word Anti-Semites
>
>> I think it would be better if the word "antisemitism" was removed from the
English
>> language. (It's never been clear whether it's based on race, religion or
whatever.)
>
> What isn't very clear, is why this is so important to you, personally
>
> As it clearly is.
>
> Because you can rest assured, that anti-semites themselves, are actually
> "proud" to be called anti-semites. And they'll go on calling themselves
> anti semites and spraying their swastikas on Jewish graves regardless
> of what you might think or say.
>
> And they don't care whether their hatred is based on race or religion
> or "whatever", either
If antisemitism were abolished, there would be no more anti-semites.
>> Maybe people wouldn't be so keen to claim Jewishness.
>
> While on the other hand, maybe other people shouldn't be so keen to
> demonstrate all sorts of other things, either.
--
Max Demian
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|