From: usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk 
  
 On 4 Aug 2025 13:30:13 GMT, "Jeff Gaines"  wrote: 
  
 >On 04/08/2025 in message  Mark 
 >Goodge wrote: 
 > 
 >>On 3 Aug 2025 20:57:12 GMT, "Jeff Gaines"  wrote: 
 >> 
 >>>On 03/08/2025 in message  Mark 
 >>>Goodge wrote: 
 >>>> 
 >>>>Also, having a list doesn't help when the relevant question is whether or 
 >>>>not something falls within one of the items on the list. I presume that 
 >>>>both 
 >>>>Christianity and Islam would be on your list. But would Jeohvah's 
 >>>>Witnesses 
 >>>>and Christadelphians be included as Christians? If not, would they have 
 >>>>their own separate entries? Would Druze be included as Islam, or would 
 >>>>they 
 >>>>have a separate entry? Because whatver decision you make here, you are 
 >>>>going 
 >>>>to offend a significant number of people and an even greater number of 
 >>>>people will disagree with you. 
 >>> 
 >>>There are several definitions of "religion" on Google, the legislation 
 >>>would refer to "religion" as defined, it seems to me that a fairly normal 
 >>>way of doing things. 
 >> 
 >>But which of those several definitions would legislation use? Bearing in 
 >>mind that some of them are mutually contradictory. 
 > 
 >The most sensible one I suppose, I am merely proposing we need to look at 
 >some lop sided legislation not trying to draft new laws :-) 
  
 Everybody thinks their definition is the most sensible. Otherwise, there 
 wouldn't be multiple different definitions. 
  
 Mark 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)