XPost: uk.politics.misc
From: hex@unseen.ac.am
On 14/07/2019 08:55, Keema's Nan wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2019, Norman Wells wrote
> (in article ):
>
>> On 13/07/2019 11:23, Pamela wrote:
>>> On 11:07 13 Jul 2019, Keema's Nan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 13 Jul 2019, Pamela wrote
>>>> (in article ):
>>>>
>>>>> On 08:40 13 Jul 2019, Ian Jackson
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In message<0001HW.22D9288F002BB4A67000018152EF@news.giganews.com>,
>>>>>> Keema's Nan writes
>>>>>>> On 12 Jul 2019, Ian Jackson wrote
>>>>>>> (in article <+b$nYvBG9OKdFwZ1@brattleho.plus.com>):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In message, Pamela
>>>>>>>> writes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nor should our ambassador be allowed to resign almost
>>>>>>>>> immediately because that causes considerable damage to
>>>>>>>>> Britain's image.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
>>>>>>>> Know when to walk away and know when to run"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you really think Trump would make any kind of decent poker
>>>>>>> player? If he had a bad hand he would throw a hissy fit, and if
>>>>>>> anyone beat him, he would stick them on death row for crimes
>>>>>>> against the president.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which all goes to prove we should have called his bluff.
>>>>>> No. It's unlikely that Trump will ever say "Let's kiss and make up."
>>>>>> When his private communications to the UK government were made
>>>>>> public, Darroch's position became untenable, and his job impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump respects those who stand up to him.
>>>>
>>>> Precisely, and walks all over those who back down.
>>>>
>>>> Notice how the sycophants are endlessly repeating the "Darroch's
>>>> position became untenable, and his job impossible line, which will
>>>> continue until they realise just how much they have been duped by a
>>>> power mad nut job.
>>>>
>>>> Once they realise their mistake they will go deathly silent on the
>>>> subject, and revert to the no-deal Brexit nonsense.
>>>
>>> The real danger comes from showing Trump how a few noisy tweets can force
>>> the UK to remove its carefully selected ambassador within a mere 72
hours.
>>
>> The UK did not remove him. He decided to resign. Off his own bat.
>>
>>> Trump now knows the UK doesn't fight back when he gets angry.
>>>
>>> We should have dragged this out for months, perhaps recalling Darroch,
and
>>> put up with Trump's petulance
>>
>> Leaving us with no amabssador in the USA. How would that help?
>>
>>> -- except that after Brexit we have no other
>>> place to go than America.
>>
>> The UK doesn't have to 'go' anywhere.
>>
>>> No other country in Europe would have rolled over so fast. It's hard to
>>> be proud to be British when Quislings run this country. Thank you for
>>> nothing, Boris.
>>
>> It may have escaped your attention, but Boris does not 'run this
>> country'. He's not Prime Minister. He's not even in the government.
>> He doesn't appoint ambassadors, nor remove them.
>
> The €€€on message€€€ but totally naive right wing response -
>
> €€€It€€€s just not ambassadorial conduct€€€ - Harrumph
>
> €€€He was left with no choice€€€ - Harrumph
>
> €€€Position was untenable€€€ - Harrumph
>
> €€€Government not involved€€€ - Harrumph
>
> €€€The OSA has been broken€€€ - Harrumph
>
> €€€This is a case for the police€€€ - Harrumph
>
> Repeat at least 30 times......
Six harrumphs do not an argument make.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|