XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur 
 From: tims_new_home@yahoo.com 
  
 "Dave Plowman (News)"  wrote in message 
 news:58035e4be3dave@davenoise.co.uk... 
 > In article , 
 >   Steve Walker  wrote: 
 >> >>> Would a vote to remain have stopped Farage and the anti-EU press 
 >> >>> constantly calling for another referendum, then? We know the answer 
 >> >>> as 
 >> >>> regards Farage, since he said it on live TV. 
 >> > 
 >> >> He said it wouldn't be the end of the matter.  He didn't say he and 
 >> >> all 
 >> >> his supporters would have tantrums and do their level best to 
 >> >> interfere 
 >> >> with the democratic process.  Personally, I would have accepted the 
 >> >> result until further information or material change came to light that 
 >> >> justified the issue being reopened. 
 >> > 
 >> > Have you a short memory? After the referendum, we had a general 
 >> > election. 
 >> > With May asking the country for a decent majority to carry out Brexit. 
 >> > And 
 >> > she ended up with no real working majority. And UKIP decimated. 
 >> > 
 >> > Why do you think that was, if 'the will of the people' was a nice clean 
 >> > quick Brexit? 
 > 
 >> Both the major parties stood on manifestos of respecting the result of 
 >> the referendum. 
 > 
 > And what result would that be? Crashing out or a new deal? That is the 
 > problem with a binary choice of in or out. Even more so, given leave 
 > promised us a much better deal than being a member would be easy to 
 > achieve. 
  
 If other parties don't like the deal that we are ending up with, then they 
 should have engaged with the process in the first place. 
  
 Instead of snipping from sidelines about how hard it is to get a deal trying 
 their best to leverage that into Revoking. 
  
 tim 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)