XPost: uk.radio.amateur, uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y 
 From: dave@davenoise.co.uk 
  
 In article , 
    Norman Wells  wrote: 
 > On 14/10/2019 15:08, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: 
 > > In article , 
 > >     Norman Wells  wrote: 
 > >> On 14/10/2019 10:41, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: 
 > >>> In article , 
 > >>> Norman Wells  wrote: 
 > > 
 > >>>> The problem is that Brexiteers have not been leading the process. 
 > >>>> Remainers, aided and abetted by a Remainer Parliament, have been doing 
 > >>>> that.  We've only had someone properly interested in achieving Brexit 
 > >>>> since we've had Boris as PM.  And that's not very long. 
 > >>> 
 > >>> Now describe the major differences between his deal and May's. 
 > > 
 > >> Stop asking difficult questions. 
 > > 
 > >> At least he's said we will be out on 31 October, deal or no deal. 
 > > 
 > > I take it you are in favour of government by dictator? 
  
 > Not everything can be decided or negotiated by committee.  Sometimes, 
 > the power has to be given to one person. 
  
 > We've always given certain powers to just the Prime Minister.  It's 
 > nothing new. 
  
 Lets just analyse that. You think it OK for Boris to take us out with no 
 deal, but not OK if May had tried to impose her deal? 
  
 > >> If 
 > >> anything prevents that, it will be the Benn Act, passed hobblingly by a 
 > >> Remainer Parliament. 
 > > 
 > > Odd, isn't it? The way leave went on and on about regaining 
 > > sovereignty. And when that sovereignty bites them on the arse, call 
 > > foul. 
  
 > We haven't regained any sovereignty if Parliament prevents us from 
 > regaining it, which seems its intention. 
  
 Sovereignty effectively *is* parliament, in the UK. 
  
 -- 
 *We waste time, so you don't have to * 
  
     Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW 
                   To e-mail, change noise into sound. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)