XPost: uk.radio.amateur, uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y 
 From: hex@unseen.ac.am 
  
 On 14/10/2019 18:16, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: 
 > In article , 
 >     Norman Wells  wrote: 
 >> On 14/10/2019 15:08, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: 
 >>> In article , 
 >>>      Norman Wells  wrote: 
 >>>> On 14/10/2019 10:41, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: 
 >>>>> In article , 
 >>>>> Norman Wells  wrote: 
 >>> 
 >>>>>> The problem is that Brexiteers have not been leading the process. 
 >>>>>> Remainers, aided and abetted by a Remainer Parliament, have been doing 
 >>>>>> that.  We've only had someone properly interested in achieving Brexit 
 >>>>>> since we've had Boris as PM.  And that's not very long. 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> Now describe the major differences between his deal and May's. 
 >>> 
 >>>> Stop asking difficult questions. 
 >>> 
 >>>> At least he's said we will be out on 31 October, deal or no deal. 
 >>> 
 >>> I take it you are in favour of government by dictator? 
 > 
 >> Not everything can be decided or negotiated by committee.  Sometimes, 
 >> the power has to be given to one person. 
 > 
 >> We've always given certain powers to just the Prime Minister.  It's 
 >> nothing new. 
 > 
 > Lets just analyse that. You think it OK for Boris to take us out with no 
 > deal, but not OK if May had tried to impose her deal? 
 > 
 >>>> If 
 >>>> anything prevents that, it will be the Benn Act, passed hobblingly by a 
 >>>> Remainer Parliament. 
 >>> 
 >>> Odd, isn't it? The way leave went on and on about regaining 
 >>> sovereignty. And when that sovereignty bites them on the arse, call 
 >>> foul. 
 > 
 >> We haven't regained any sovereignty if Parliament prevents us from 
 >> regaining it, which seems its intention. 
 > 
 > Sovereignty effectively *is* parliament, in the UK. 
  
 Not when it's trying to prevent us having it. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)