
| Msg # 31883 of 32022 on ZZUK4447, Monday 11-06-22, 6:06 |
| From: JNUGENT |
| To: PANCHO |
| Subj: Re: Brexit deal almost agreed! |
XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur From: jenningsltd@fastmail.fm On 14/10/2019 11:16, Pancho wrote: > On 14/10/2019 11:03, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:34:24 +0000, Incubus wrote: >> >>> The only "flaw" with the referendum is that it returned the result you >>> didn't want.€€ You wouldn't be whining about "flaws" and "lies" if the >>> result had been to remain in the EU.€€ You'd have no time for any >>> arguments in favour of a second referendum or ignoring the result then. >> >> Yeah, just like 1975 all over again and the BIG LIE back then: it was >> just a 'common market' and certainly not a step on the road to a federal >> superstate; oh no, no, heaven forefend. >> > > Forefend - I don't think I have ever seen that word before. I see the > phrase "heaven forfend" is recognised as a standard phrase, but I have > never heard it, always heaven forbid. > > I like a new word, but it doesn't really seem to have enough to offer to > justify using it. > > Where do you come form? It's usually expressed as "heavens forfend" and an early use of it may be found in Act 1 of Shakespeare's "Troilus And Cressida". I'm sure it was also used by Rumpole in at least one of the stories (but Horace was much given to quoting the classics). --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,120 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca