XPost: uk.radio.amateur, uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y 
 From: tnp@invalid.invalid 
  
 On 14/10/2019 11:36, Incubus wrote: 
 > On 2019-10-14, The Todal  wrote: 
 >> On 14/10/2019 10:54, Incubus wrote: 
 >>> On 2019-10-13, nightjar  wrote: 
 >>>> On 13/10/2019 16:43, tim... wrote: 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> "nightjar"  wrote in message 
 >>>>> news:YMCdnZDnRYaYlT7AnZ2dnUU78I_NnZ2d@giganews.com... 
 >>>> ... 
 >>>>>> Of greater influence are probably dissatisfaction with the mess that 
 >>>>>> the Brexiteers have made of the process so far 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> ITYF it was a Remainer who made a mess of the process 
 >>>> 
 >>>> Mrs May achieved a reasonable deal that the EU could live with. It was 
 >>>> the extreme Brexiteers who stopped that deal getting through parliament. 
 >>> 
 >>> The deal was an absolute turd but you will find that Remainers in 
 Parliament 
 >>> also voted it down. 
 >>> 
 >> 
 >> The deal was actually an excellent one, and it is still the only 
 >> alternative to a no-deal and there's certainly a chance that MPs will 
 >> approve it now they realise that it's this deal or no deal. 
 > 
 > If you think the deal was excellent then you haven't understood it. 
 > 
 Or alternatively he realises it is even better than being in the EU, for 
 the EU, and hates Britain enough to think that is good. 
  
 >> So "absolute turd"? Will you feel betrayed? Will you march on the 
 >> streets to demand that Boris resigns, after we leave the EU with Theresa 
 >> May's deal? 
 >> 
 >> Honestly? 
 > 
 > It depends on what is renegotiated.  The most dangerous aspect was the 
 > "backstop". 
 > 
 The backstop meant 'you can never leave' 
  
  
 -- 
 Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)