XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur 
 From: abelard3@abelard.org 
  
 On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:28:11 +1100, "Jane Black"  
 wrote: 
  
 >I assume that the reason for the 15 years is that plenty of the poms 
 >never bothered to renounce UK citizenship or get naturalised in the 
 >country they chose to migrate to. That has changed a bit lately now 
 >that some will ship those who have been involved in crime back to 
 >the UK again. That didn€t used to happen previously. 
 > 
 >Now that some countries have tightened up on who can migrate 
 >to their country, some poms have been told that they never had 
 >any right to migrate and are asked to leave now too. 
  
 britain joined a club with 'ever closer union' as a core rule... 
     the objective was to forge one country and the 'laws' 
     reflect that 
  
 another core rule/'law' was/is 'freedom of movement' 
  
 to apply retrospective 'laws' to those who have already 
     acted under the present 'laws' is bad 'law' 
  
 you may legitimately apply new rules to new movers after 
     leaving but to apply it to those who acted under previous 
     'law' or even until the 'laws' change is very dodgy.... 
  
 doubtless the 15 year rule was allowed by idiots like bliar 
    to remove non-socialist votes 
  
  
 -- 
 www.abelard.org 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)