XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur 
 From: dave@davenoise.co.uk 
  
 In article <0001HW.23533798000B6E74700000BBC2EF@news.giganews.com>, 
    Keema's Nan  wrote: 
 > > I see your mistake. You think the referendum was a football match with 
 > > winner takes all. In fact, the vote was more or less evenly split and MPs 
 > > will take that into account. 
  
 > Ok, but not quite evenly split though, was it? 
  
 No. It was approximately 1/3rd. 
  
 > > 
 > > 
 > > A second referendum will serve to show Parliament if the original 
 > > split has been preserved after voters have seen what Brexit really 
 > > looks like. 
  
 > No one can see what Brexit looks like until they have experienced it. 
  
 Which could be too late for many jobs based on free trade with the EU. 
  
 > All we have, is what bullshitters tell us Brexit will be like. 
  
 I certainly remember being told how easy it would be to get a new deal 
 with the EU giving us all we wanted. Since they need us more than we need 
 them. 
  
 > If we are allowed a few years of Brexit and then have a referendum based 
 > on 'stay out' or 're-join', that would be sensible. But common sense is 
 > what the remain-filled UK establishment do not possess. 
  
 The nest few years will be spend sorting out just what sort of deal we end 
 up with in detail. Any agreement now is simply a starting point. And if we 
 leave without one, those negotiations will simply take longer. A lot 
 longer. 
  
 -- 
 *You can't teach an old mouse new clicks * 
  
     Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW 
                   To e-mail, change noise into sound. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)