XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur 
 From: CD@noreply.com 
  
 On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:49:24 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: 
  
 > In article <0001HW.23533798000B6E74700000BBC2EF@news.giganews.com>, 
 >    Keema's Nan  wrote: 
 >> > I see your mistake. You think the referendum was a football match 
 >> > with winner takes all. In fact, the vote was more or less evenly 
 >> > split and MPs will take that into account. 
 > 
 >> Ok, but not quite evenly split though, was it? 
 > 
 > No. It was approximately 1/3rd. 
  
 Still a higher number than the brainwashed clowns like you who voted to 
 Remain. 
  
 >> No one can see what Brexit looks like until they have experienced it. 
 > 
 > Which could be too late for many jobs based on free trade with the EU. 
  
 There won't be any tariff barriers; it's in no one's interests. 
  
 > I certainly remember being told how easy it would be to get a new deal 
 > with the EU giving us all we wanted. Since they need us more than we 
 > need them. 
  
 They need us *even more* due to our economies have diverged since the 
 vote. Germany and the rest of contintental Europe's have gone down the 
 shitter; ours has held its own ground very well in spite of everything 
 going tits-up in the wider world. 
  
 >> If we are allowed a few years of Brexit and then have a referendum 
 >> based on 'stay out' or 're-join', that would be sensible. But common 
 >> sense is what the remain-filled UK establishment do not possess. 
 > 
 > The nest few years will be spend sorting out just what sort of deal we 
 > end up with in detail. Any agreement now is simply a starting point. And 
 > if we leave without one, those negotiations will simply take longer. A 
 > lot longer. 
  
 Nope. Leaving without a deal will concentrate minds wonderfully, but 
 sadly I doubt it will come to that as I don't trust Boris any more than I 
 trusted May. 
  
  
  
 -- 
 Leave first - THEN negotiate! 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)