XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur 
 From: pamela.uklegal@gmail.com 
  
 On 13:49  13 Oct 2019, "Dave Plowman (News)"  wrote: 
  
 > In article <0001HW.23533798000B6E74700000BBC2EF@news.giganews.com>, 
 >    Keema's Nan  wrote: 
 >> > I see your mistake. You think the referendum was a football match 
 >> > with winner takes all. In fact, the vote was more or less evenly 
 >> > split and MPs will take that into account. 
 > 
 >> Ok, but not quite evenly split though, was it? 
 > 
 > No. It was approximately 1/3rd. 
 > 
 >> > 
 >> > 
 >> > A second referendum will serve to show Parliament if the original 
 >> > split has been preserved after voters have seen what Brexit really 
 >> > looks like. 
 > 
 >> No one can see what Brexit looks like until they have experienced it. 
 > 
 > Which could be too late for many jobs based on free trade with the EU. 
 > 
 >> All we have, is what bullshitters tell us Brexit will be like. 
 > 
 > I certainly remember being told how easy it would be to get a new deal 
 > with the EU giving us all we wanted. Since they need us more than we 
 > need them. 
 > 
 >> If we are allowed a few years of Brexit and then have a referendum 
 >> based on 'stay out' or 're-join', that would be sensible. But common 
 >> sense is what the remain-filled UK establishment do not possess. 
 > 
 > The nest few years will be spend sorting out just what sort of deal we 
 > end up with in detail. Any agreement now is simply a starting point. And 
 > if we leave without one, those negotiations will simply take longer. A 
 > lot longer. 
  
 How true. 
  
 In fact, for many leavers, Brexit has become an end it itself. 
  
 Brexit serves no useful purpose.  However, fanatical leavers have nailed 
 their colours to its mast and now insist we leave to satisfy their sense 
 of pride. 
  
 Boris's "Let's get Brexit done" is based on the totally false premise that 
 it will be over when we leave. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)