From: pamela.uklegal@gmail.com 
  
 On 09:42  28 Oct 2019, The Todal  wrote: 
  
 > On 25/10/2019 21:46, Fredxx wrote: 
 >> On 25/10/2019 20:16:38, Pamela wrote: 
 >>> On 16:29€€ 25 Oct 2019, RH156RH  wrote: 
 >>> 
 >>>> €€ Many MPs and political commentators seem to be oblivious to the 
 >>>> fact €€ that they are embracing an absurdity when they insist€€ that 
 >>>> a "No Deal €€ Brexit" is made impossible.€€ This is absurd because if 
 >>>> there is€€ no €€ deal€€ embraced by a majority of€€ MPs€€ then by 
 >>>> definition the default €€ position€€ is no deal unless€€ Parliament€€ 
 >>>> votes to revoke Article 50. 
 >>> 
 >>> Good idea. A second referendum might also help. 
 >> 
 >> How does that help anyone if the result is still a majority for leave? 
 > 
 > It avoids time-consuming arguments about whether "the people" want a 
 > no-deal Brexit or a deal which makes compromises and gives us access to 
 > the single market. 
 > 
 > We've spent more than 3 years arguing about what Brexit means, in the 
 > manner of theologians arguing about the meaning of scripture. The 
 > electorate are bored and impatient but it is quite wrong to say that MPs 
 > have been wasting time. 
  
 The three years' argument was largely taken up by restraining extremists who 
 falsely claimed a mandate for all their pet political aspirations. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)