XPost: uk.politics.misc 
 From: hex@unseen.ac.am 
  
 On 14/07/2019 09:16, Mike Scott wrote: 
 > On 14/07/2019 09:07, Norman Wells wrote: 
 >> On 14/07/2019 08:56, Keema's Nan wrote: 
 >>> On 13 Jul 2019, Norman Wells wrote 
 >>> (in article ): 
 >>>> On 13/07/2019 20:36, Keema's Nan wrote: 
 >>>>> On 13 Jul 2019, Norman Wells wrote 
 >>>>> (in article ): 
 >> 
 >>>>>> Some fights are pointless fighting. This is one. 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> You can€€€t prove it, because no one was man enough to stand their 
 >>>>> ground 
 >>>>> and stare the nut-job Trump down. 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> And anyway, it wasn€€€t a fight at all. 
 >>>> 
 >>>> You would have made it one, though, totally unnecessarily. 
 >>>> 
 >>>>> It was a deliberate contravention of the OSA. 
 >>>> 
 >>>> The what? 
 >>> 
 >>> I see the dumb troll has returned. 
 >> 
 >> Since Nan is completely unable to say what he means, I throw it open 
 >> to anyone who can. 
 >> 
 >> Is it some sort of agreement? 
 >> 
 > I think he means the official secrets act. 
  
 Maybe, but I guess we'll never know for sure.  It's more plausible 
 anyway than Google's pages of obstructive sleep apnea. 
  
 > But while half-listening to the radio this morning, it seems the 
 > journalist who leaked the papers is married to a Brexit MEP. Therefore 
 > it's all a plan on the part of the Brexit camp to...... well, I'm not 
 > entirely sure what, and maybe I mis-heard. But it did come over as 
 > another excuse to knock brexit over something apparently unrelated. 
  
 I agree.  Everything's Brexit's fault to those still in denial. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)