[continued from previous message] 
  
 daring to speak their conscience, for expressing the world's most forbidden 
 opinion, the idea that the historical event trademarked as the Holocaust as 
 it is popularly presented, is not an accurate historical portrayal, that it 
 needs like all other events of history to be questioned, researched freely 
 and constantly revised. 
  
 Perhaps the hypocrisy is illustrated by devotion of Europe to freedom for 
 the vilest kinds of pornography. Every kind of the sickest pornography is 
 allowed in the Western world today, including pornography that delves into 
 the worst forms of sadism and masochism and the vilest degradation of women, 
 many of whom have been drug addicted and truly enslaved in what the world 
 calls White slavery. Yet, these sickest, evil forms of porn are not only 
 legal in Europe, they are lucrative! Yet, if you dare to research and offer 
 a dissenting opinion about any aspect of the event singularly called the 
 Holocaust, it's off to prison for you, its bankruptcy for you and your 
 family. 
  
 In Europe you can freely question, ridicule, and deny Jesus Christ. The same 
 is true for the prophet Muhammed, and nothing will happen to you, heck you 
 might even get to star in your own weekly TV show, but offer a single 
 question of the smallest part of the Holocaust and you face prison! 
  
 David Irving one of the world's most famous and well-read historians, a 
 writer who many mainstream historians have praised as brilliant and 
 accurate, at this moment sits in a prison near Vienna, Austria for simply 
 stating his historical opinion about Auschwitz in a lecture in Austria in 
 1989. German researcher/chemist Gemar Rudolf faces years of imprisonment for 
 simply publishing a detailed forensic analysis that challenged the 
 authenticity of alleged Auschwitz gas chambers. Ernst Zundel, a resident of 
 Canada and the U.S was ripped from his wife and home because he had 
 politically incorrect opinions about the events of the Second World War. 
  
 I have been honored to know personally all three of these men. They are 
 kind, witty, humorous, men of family, of kindness and decency. None of these 
 men were hateful or advocated hate, none were violent or advocated violence, 
 none of these men were terrorists or supported terrorists, none of these men 
 did anything other than express an intellectual opinion at variance with 
 high priests of the Holocaust. All these men did was have the courage to 
 express their opinions even though they knew that by doing so everything 
 they held dear was endangered, their safety, their sustenance, their 
 freedom, but they chose their conscience and their honor, even at the risk 
 of life, that their own heart might be stilled forever. They still stood 
 tall. 
  
 I am not here to argue the truth or untruth of their claims, that is for the 
 other speakers here, but I am here to add my voice from America from free 
 men and women everywhere that the fact that these men are imprisoned is a 
 scandal and injustice. The whole world knows that imprisoning men for their 
 opinions is tyranny; that such is the opposite of everything that we mean by 
 the word freedom. As some nations of Europe jail men for their opinions, 
 these same nations boast about their supposed freedom and hold themselves 
 above many other nations they view as repressive and backward. 
  
 Some of the brave men here today at this conference have been jailed, even 
 physically attacked, lost reputation, freedom, property, career, simply for 
 speaking their conscience. I see a number of them as I look in the audience. 
 And none of these men write or speak hatefully or intemperately, but how can 
 the world even know that, when they and their beliefs are repressed by 
 government and media. 
  
 I want to honor one of the men here for his sacrifices over the years in his 
 obedience to conscience and to truth, a man who has laid in a hospital bed 
 with his bones crushed, his pain-racked body burned by acid, all for doing 
 what his intellect dictated and his conscious demanded. He is Dr. Robert 
 Faurisson, and we here and the world owe him a debt that we can never 
 adequately repay. Lesser men would have given up and lived the quiet life, 
 but he gave his all and he still gives us his all even now. I would like to 
 ask you to stand up for him ladies and gentlemen. Robert Faurrison, the 
 best-known revisionist in the world today. 
  
 The main theme of the Holocaust Conference is that there must be freedom of 
 speech on this subject as on all others. Free speech, inquiry and debate are 
 the only way to learn the truth on any issue. 
  
 In prosecutions of Holocaust questioners, authorities have not allowed 
 introduction of any evidence supporting the defendant's claims. The courts 
 have even announced in their guilty verdicts that "The truth is no defense," 
 i.e. that even if the defendant can be shown to be honest and accurate, and 
 even if his claims can be substantiated by physical and documentary 
 evidence, he has broken the law by simply questioning aspects of the 
 official Holocaust Story. 
  
 I take no hard position on the historical accuracy of the Holocaust, I leave 
 that to those whose whole lives are devoted to the study of the issue, but I 
 take an unshakeable position on freedom. Obviously, Jews, as well as other 
 nationalities suffered great losses during the Second World War. 
  
 Repression, dispossession or murder against any group is wrong. 
  
 Revisionists don't deny that many Jews died and suffered greatly in the war, 
 they condemn any and all injustices done to Jews in that period. 
  
 It must also be understood that throughout history, the historical treatment 
 of atrocities or crimes against humanity have often been colored by 
 political purposes. Throughout history some crimes against humanity have 
 been exaggerated and emphasized to justify political agendas or even war. 
 Other crimes against humanity have been completely ignored or downplayed. 
  
 An example is the contrast between the crimes of National Socialist Germany 
 and that of Soviet Communism. Most researchers readily acknowledge that 
 Bolshevism imprisoned, tortured and slaughtered many times more people in 
 Russia and in Eastern Europe than even the high numbers alleged in the 
 Holocaust. Yet, the Soviet Holocaust receives not one-hundredth of the 
 attention of the Jewish Holocaust. Can anyone here name even a single movie 
 you have seen about the Bolshevik slaughter? 
  
 Isn't it sensible to think that this disparity is because of the strong 
 Jewish influence in Western media from the entertainment establishment of 
 Hollywood to the news media centered in New York and across the European 
 world? Revisionists suggest that an exaggeration and saturation of the 
 Holocaust has been essential to establishment and support of the Zionist 
 state in Israel and that it offers a psychological excuse for the large 
 scale ethnic cleansing, repression, torture and genocide against the 
 Palestinian people. 
  
 Revisionists argue that this vested interest of much of the pro-Zionist 
 media and pro-Zionist governments affords a danger that the Holocaust can be 
 distorted and politicized just as many historical crimes against humanity 
 have either been exaggerated or diminished in pursuit of political agendas. 
  
 Whether the revisionists scholars are right or wrong is for you to decide, 
 not those who want to crush free thought and free speech. 
  
 I and every speaker at this conference believe in freedom of speech on all 
 historical and contemporary issues. 
  
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)