
| Msg # 320 of 328 on ZZNY4445, Thursday 9-28-22, 3:58 |
| From: VOTER |
| To: ALL |
| Subj: Aborting in the First Three Months is Li |
XPost: alt.abortion.inequity, alt.support.abortion, us.issues.abortion XPost: soc.men, alt.health From: Voter@Vote2016.com Aborting a fetus in the first three months is not only 100% moral, but it is immoral not to abort. There is no brain in the fetus for the first three months, and no ghost either. If you read people's stories of memories of being in the womb, they have real memories of being babies alive in the womb. These same people yet have memories of reincarnation - of being a Ghost and then being in the womb for less than 9 months. Of being in the womb probably no more than five months at most. Read their stories. _IF_ there is no brain, and no ghost, in the fetus, then not aborting is making a decision to get pregnant. While obviously the day before the baby is born, it is just two people attached, but you have a right to detach your body, vs. an ethical requirement to throw someone a rope. Carrying a baby who eats your body for 6 months is more onerous than throwing someone a rope. It is perhaps closer to jumping into an icy cold river to save someone. Someone you don't want or know. If you were on a 6 month trek through the wilderness, with only 2,000 calories per day to feed you, and you met a starving person, would you starve _with_ them, eating 1,000 calories for the rest of your 6 month trek through the wilderness, to emerge skinny and weak, but alive? Would it be a crime not to feed them? Carrying a baby is letting a baby eat your body. What if the woman could just pull the fetus out of her? Would that be a crime? You weren't born Siamese twins. Your body is not theirs. If you went through the Star Trek transporter and came out attached to someone, and they were using your kidney, and their kidney didn't make the transport, and there was 6 months to wait for a kidney, would you stay attached to this stranger for 6 months to let them live? What if you both had guns, and you were like, we're going to go get detached, and they were like, no, we're not, and you were like, if you kill me, you'll die, but if I kill you, I'll live. What if it was more than 6 months to wait for a kidney, like 9 years? What if you were in excruciating pain that could only be relieved by separation, but they would die? What if you could just pull yourself off of them, and they would die, and you would live? Would it be a crime to do so? What if the woman could just pull the fetus out of her? What if they could be detached from you, and re-attached to someone else to live? Would those people be like paid surrogates, and does a fetus thus get free health care, to bring all babies to life? What if aliens land and lay eggs, which crawl in our feet, or we ingest accidentally through fruit, and 3 foot by 8 inch caterpillars gestate in our stomachs, accidentally for over 3 years, until they finally crawl out our mouths, and eventually turn into beautiful harmonic, human-sized butterflies who teach the nations? And these butterflies are more intelligent than humans, and wholly benevolent and helpful. What if this accidental insemination happens frequently. What if aliens land, and just generally infect everyone's legs with their young. You can't abort a rapist's insemination any more than you can kill a 30 year old product of rape, if you can't kill a normal fetus. A rapist's insemination is as much a living person as a normal fetus is. And yet you have a right to separate your body so far as I've suggested. What if a Siamese twin kills? Do they both go to prison? Has this ever happened? Is the law not bunk, and is not self defense the solution? Should we not be letting the chips fall where they may, and doing away with the law, to replace it with an benevolent and helpful advocate which recognizes and promotes the humanity in all humankind? _IF_ there is no brain, and no ghost, in the fetus, then not aborting is making a decision to get pregnant. There's no person living in you for at least the first three months. If you don't abort, it's just like you decided to get pregnant. If a sperm and an egg were sitting next to each other in a petri dish, and then the sperm impregnated the egg, would you believe, that was a human with a brain and a ghost? Do you believe that you came out of a zygote? Are you a materialist, atheist, deathist who believes only in the material world? There is life after death. There is life before life. The ghost enters the fetus at various times in its development. This begs the question, could a baby be born without a ghost; especially in Africa, where there are tons and tons of babies, and no one would want to be born in Africa. But I imagine it would be born stillborn. Unplanned childbirth is the scourge of nations. Unplanned childbirth is the cause of overpopulation. There are too many people for the property. There is not enough capital for the labor. Rather than a Holocaust as was caused by the Great Depression, the solution is to stop unplanned pregnancies. The human race is an animal like any other, that can kill off its habitat and resultingly die en masse. Like a Kuala Bear group that needs to be culled, but the solution is to stop unplanned pregnancy. 37% of American society is unplanned. Babies born to mother's who didn't plan them certainly face a life of likely greater poverty and hardship. Drug abusers certainly don't practice abstinence if they are reckless enough to abuse drugs. People using needles, and injecting Heroin, get pregnant at 19. The last thing they need is a baby. The first thing they need is an abortion. This is not theoretical. This is solid fact. Only 40% of all unplanned pregnancies, or nearly 1 million are happily terminated in abortion. Sadly, 60% of all unplanned pregnancies or 1.5 million, are not. 1.5 million out of 4 million babies born per year are unplanned. This is 37%. This is outrageous. This is certainly going to have a negative socio-economic effect on our so-called civilization. Half the unplanned pregnancies and childbirths, occurred in people who used 1 type of birth control, but were not responsible enough to just use 2 or 3 types of birth control concurrently. The other half occurred in people who used no protection. A sexually active couple will be pregnant in 10 years on the pill, in 5-6 years using only condoms, and in 1 year [continued in next message] --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,084 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca