XPost: talk.politics.misc, or.politics, seattle.politics 
 XPost: ca.politics 
  
 On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 03:45:38 GMT, retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote: 
  
 >On 24 Oct 2004 19:07:20 -0700, hlillywh@juno.com (Hal Lillywhite) 
 >wrote: 
 > 
 >>I think that is the wrong question.  The real question is, "How many 
 >>lives are we willing to lose to allow overregulation and a hyperactive 
 >>legal profession to make sure prices are held down and companies 
 >>exposed to large and often unfair legal awards? 
 > 
 > 
 >Given the deregulation of the last 25 years and the results in the S&L 
 >crisis, the tech bubble, the merger mania, the Enron scandal and the 
 >rest, and the brokerage scandals and the insurance scandals, etc., 
 >etc. -  you want to speak of over regulation? 
 > 
 >You might also try to rationalize why our "over regulated, over 
 >litigious" society still out performs all others. Could it be there's 
 >actually a cause and effect there? 
  
  
  
  
 ______________ 
 Bush Cheney - Putting the CON in Conservative 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)