XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.california 
 From: pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com 
  
 "Rev. Dr. TRUTH"  wrote in message 
 news:1c816197.0308051854.2f39b043@posting.google.com... 
 > Ward Stewart  wrote in message 
 news:... 
 > 
 > > You consider it to be indecent and radical that George and I, after 
 > > nearly a half-century together should seek the protections that are 
 > > automatic for opposite sex couples? 
 > 
 > It sure is!  What you and George got going is ABOMINATION in the eyes 
 > of God!  God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah with fire and brimstone on 
 > account of the same kind of nasty butt sex you and your lover boy are 
 > into.  Don't you know that?  Why do you think God put sperm in your 
 > balls?  Not for some man's pleasure let me tell you!  It was to make 
 > babies with - with a WOMAN!  And you and Boy George may have been 
 > together "nearly" a half century, but you aren't telling how many 
 > times during that "nearly" fifty years that one of you fooled around 
 > on the other.  Fags are promiscuous and want new meat on their plates 
 > with every feast - meat that's all young, hung and full of sp-ng!. 
 > What you fags want is to bring down the institution of marriage and to 
 > get your dirty d-cks into little boys quasi legally.  You wouldn't 
 > know "commitment" if it sideswiped you on the freeway of fornication 
 > you're all cruising down right now.  God won't stand for it, and 
 > neither will this country as long as there are God fearing people like 
 > me in it. 
  
 If, as you claim, god won't stand for the type of relationship Ward and his 
 partner have, why do you suppose you god has let it be and indeed flourish 
 for almost fifty years without the dreaded fire and brimstone?  Is your god 
 falling down on the job?  Or are you mistaken about your god's will?  Seems 
 that if he has not smited those two by this time, seems kinda obvious that 
 he has no intention of smiting them at all! 
  
 It further seems that if they are happy about the relationsip and you are 
 UN-happy about something that does not concern you at all, is it possible, 
 even likely that your god isn't all that upset about it and that you alone 
 are the one in a tizzy?  And since your god is supposed to lord over (pardon 
 the pun) all in heaven and earth, why to you suppose he (your god) prefers 
 having you all bent out of shape about something that doesn't concern you, 
 yet allows the participants in that relations be happy about it? 
  
 > Them fruity Anglicans may think they can defy God by electing a fag 
 > priest as a bishoprick - even though he fondled other men and put porn 
 > links on his website for kids 
  
 Actually, the "inappropriate touching" turned out to be a touch on the arm 
 and ther back (fully clothed and in a group situation), not one of the 
 kinkier erogenous zones that I'm aware of. 
  
  
 > - but God AIN'T mocked by that or anything else no fag does. 
  
 Seems more like you are mocking and dishonoring your god by making false and 
 wild claims.  Might that be considered creating your own god?  And wouldn't 
 that be against on of your handbook's "commandments?"  (I refer to the one 
 that states, "Thou shalt have no other Gods before me" in case you've 
 forgotten.) 
  
 Is it that you are asking for Ward or Fritz or one of those gay boys you 
 claim to "hate" (not a very christian posture) to give you a spanking? 
  
 Naughty, naughty, Rev!  You secret little fruiter, you! 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)