XPost: alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.feminism, soc.men
XPost: alt.guns
From: boby23456@hotmail.com
Phil wrote:
> On Thu, 06 May 2004 16:30:59 -0600, Bob wrote:
>
>
>>Phil wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 May 2004 09:02:07 -0600, Bob wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Even for the 2 million men now in prison for the "crime" of being men
>>>>(women in similar circumstances are NOT in prison), the warden has an
>>>>ABSOLUTE duty to protect them from violent death or harm. They have been
>>>>deprived of their ability to protect themselves, but have not been
>>>>sentenced to death by beating or to physical abuse.
>>>
>>>
>>>The ability to protect themselves? What do you suggest?
>>>Phil
>>>========
>>
>>
>>As Bob suggested before, when men are taken from their homes and locked
>>in cages without any ability to protect themselves, the warden has an
>>ABSOLUTE requirement for their protection. If any inmate is hurt or
>>injured the warden and whatever other guards may be involved have
>>committed malicious dereliction of duty resulting in death, and should
>>be convicted of at least a 3rd degree murder. There is absolutely no
>>excuse for allowing men to die under the warden's care and protection.
>
>
> But what 'ability to protect themselves' should we let those in jail
> keep?
> Phil
Who said we should? It is a question irrelevant to the absolute
obligation of the jailers to protect those men in their custody,
control, and care.
Who said that more than 2 million men should be in jail in circumstances
where women who have done equal "crime" are home watching Ophra.
The gun thugs hate men, and their feminazi handlers hate men, so they
round up as many as they can and destroy men's lives.
2 million is 2 many.
Bob
--
When did we divide into sides?
"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
