XPost: alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.feminism, soc.men 
 XPost: alt.guns 
 From: dogglebe@yahoooo.com 
  
 On Thu, 06 May 2004 16:30:59 -0600, Bob  wrote: 
  
 >Phil wrote: 
 >> On Thu, 06 May 2004 09:02:07 -0600, Bob  wrote: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>>Even for the 2 million men now in prison for the "crime" of being men 
 >>>(women in similar circumstances are NOT in prison), the warden has an 
 >>>ABSOLUTE duty to protect them from violent death or harm. They have been 
 >>>deprived of their ability to protect themselves, but have not been 
 >>>sentenced to death by beating or to physical abuse. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> The ability to protect themselves?  What do you suggest? 
 >> Phil 
 >> ======== 
 > 
 > 
 >As Bob suggested before, when men are taken from their homes and locked 
 >in cages without any ability to protect themselves, the warden has an 
 >ABSOLUTE requirement for their protection.  If any inmate is hurt or 
 >injured the warden and whatever other guards may be involved have 
 >committed malicious dereliction of duty resulting in death, and should 
 >be convicted of at least a 3rd degree murder.  There is absolutely no 
 >excuse for allowing men to die under the warden's care and protection. 
  
  
 But what 'ability to protect themselves' should we let those in jail 
 keep? 
  
 Phil 
 ======== 
 visit the New York City Homebrewers Guild website: 
 http://www.homebrewersguild.org 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)