XPost: alt.lawyers, utexas.law, talk.politics.guns 
 XPost: alt.prisons, alt.current-events.usa, alt.politics.media 
 XPost: alt.law-enforcement, talk.politics.drugs 
 From: DEMI_GOD_@SHAW.CA 
  
 "daeron"  wrote in message 
 news:4073a0f5$0$439$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... 
 > _ G O D _ wrote: 
 > > "daeron"  wrote in message 
 > >> _ G O D _ wrote: 
 > >> > "daeron"  wrote 
 > >> >> _ G O D _ wrote: 
 > >> >> > If the source of genocide is in the religious beliefs of 
 > >> >> > people, then the religious cults should be targeted, and 
 > >> >> > their activity eliminated... 
 > >> >> > 
 > >> >>  How would you do that? 
 > >> >>  Here's a exafinancialm page 62 of the Yale document: 
 > >> > 
 > >> > I was commenting on the causes and the sources of the 
 > >> > ongoing barbarity, with suggestion to look at the root of 
 > >> > the problem. 
 > >> > 
 > >>  I repeat how do you determine their "reasons" for doing 
 > >>  these 
 > >> things for forty years and across four government regimes so 
 > >> far, in a few days the fifth regime will start, though it 
 > >> will still be the military pulling the strings. 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > You, "daeron" , wrote on April 5, in: 
 > > news:4070d3a7$0$440$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... 
 > > 
 > > "US tax monies have for forty years been used to support an 
 > > Islamic Genocide by Indonesia against Christian Papuans 
 > > should disgust Americans into action.." 
 > > 
 > > Here you have clearly identified the rivaling party/ies which 
 > > caused the atrocities which you have described in a series 
 > > of posts. I have responded to that article, that if the 
 > > sources are known, and causes of the genocide have been 
 > > identified, then your government (or the UN) should take the 
 > > right action to eliminate the causes and the sources of 
 > > genocide, in order to stop it.... 
 > > 
 > 
 >  Yes, if countries were acting in a moral fashion then they 
 > would have to do so. If the US really was concerned about 
 > dictator regimes or stopping genocide or terrorism, then they 
 > would have been cleaning up the Indonesian threats to the US. 
 > 
 >  BUT they DON'T, they claim to act in their vested interest. 
 >  That is also a lie, most countries really act in the vested 
 > interest of their ruling class. 
  
 You should be aware that it's the *people*, individuals, whose 
 actions can result in one thing or another, not the *countries*.... 
  
 So, if some americunts' interests are indeed result in genocide, 
 it does not really mean the US, does it, and therefore Indonesia 
 is 'disallowed' to prevent it.... I'm sure that Indonesia has enough 
 staff and resources which can be deployed to stop any violence, 
 especially initiated by certain (known) americunts with their funds.... 
 -- 
  
  
 _____________________________________________________ 
  
  
 I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers 
 and other employees of all institutions of the incarceration industry. 
  
 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
 -------------------- 
 ----- 
  
 "The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive 
 Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or 
 high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism 
 does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It 
 undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts 
 sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it 
 helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it 
 reminds them of their responsibility."   ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~ 
 ___________________________________________________ 
 -- 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)